Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-6401 (2026)
Act, how cited
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sections 44-6401 to 44-6414 shall be known and may be cited as the Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Insurance Coverage Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1998–2020 · leading case: Jones v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Companies, 738 N.W.2d 840 (Neb. 2007).
Jones v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Companies, 738 N.W.2d 840 (Neb. 2007). “[7] Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 44-6401 to 44-6414 (Reissue 2004).”
Kratochvil v. Motor Club Ins. Ass'n, 588 N.W.2d 565 (Neb. 1999). “§ 44-6413(1)(e) (Reissue 1998) when the cause of action arose prior to passage of the 1994 Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Insurance Coverage Act (UUMICA), Neb.Rev. Stat. § 44-6401 et seq. Reissue 1993 & Cum.”
Ploen v. Union Ins., 573 N.W.2d 436 (Neb. 1998). “(Reissue 1993), we conclude that Union's underinsured motorist coverage is consistent with the requirements of the act and is not contrary to the law. Having made this conclusion, we consider Union's provision to determine whether or not it is contrary to public policy.”
Reimers-Hild v. State, 741 N.W.2d 155 (Neb. 2007). “CONCLUSION Because Reimers-Hild settled her claim against Johns, the statute of limitations on that claim did not expire, and § 44-6413(l)(e) does not apply to her claim for under-insured motorist benefits.”
Harris v. Omaha Hous. Auth., 698 N.W.2d 58 (Neb. 2005). “However, the Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Insurance Coverage Act (UUMICA), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-6401 et seq. (Reissue 2004), had become operative on January 1, 1995, and had created a specific limitation period as to when actions against insurers for uninsured motorist…”
Cont'l W. Ins. Co. v. Conn, 629 N.W.2d 494 (Neb. 2001). “Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 44-6401 to 44-6414 (Cum.”
Pogge v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins., 688 N.W.2d 634 (Neb. Ct. App. 2004). “Additionally, the Supreme Court reviewed the underinsured motorist coverage at issue in Ploen, including the exhaustion clause, under the Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Insurance Coverage Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-6401 et seq. (Cum. Supp.”
Thrower v. Anson, 752 N.W.2d 555 (Neb. 2008). “This assignment of error implicates Progressive's policy and is governed by the provisions of Nebraska's Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Insurance Coverage Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 44-6401 et seq. (Reissue 2004).”
Steffen v. Progressive N. Ins. Co., 754 N.W.2d 730 (Neb. 2008). “[6] Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 44-6401 to 44-6414 (Reissue 2004).”
Kline v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 766 N.W.2d 118 (Neb. 2009). “CONCLUSION We conclude that the not-owned-but-insured exclusion violates the UUMICA. Therefore, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, which reversed the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Farmers and remanded the cause for further proceedings.”
Deprez v. Cont'l W. Ins., 584 N.W.2d 805 (Neb. 1998). “This analysis, if made, would not apply to future claims because of the passage by the Legislature of the Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Insurance Coverage Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 44-6401 to 44-6414 (Cum.”
Steffensmeier v. Le Mars Mut. Ins. Co., 752 N.W.2d 155 (Neb. 2008). “In this respect, we note that § 44-6413( l )(a) provides in part that the "uninsured and underinsured motorist coverages provided" in the act "shall not apply to [damages] with respect to which the insured or his or her representative makes, without the written consent of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.