Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 48
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1101 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 48-1101 to 48-1127 shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 153 cases (55 in the last 5 years), 1974–2026 · leading case: Goolsby v. Anderson, 549 N.W.2d 153 (Neb. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Goolsby v. Anderson, 549 N.W.2d 153 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 14× “The district court sustained demurrers to the first, third, and fourth causes of action, which pertain to civil rights violations under the Nebraska Constitution and under the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act, Neb.Rev. Stat. § 48-1101 et seq. (Reissue 1988).”
Hartley v. Metro. Util. Dist., 885 N.W.2d 675 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 3× “The supervisor was responsible for 1 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1101 et seq. (Reissue 2010).”
Reavis v. Solminski, 551 N.W.2d 528 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 10× “(1988), or the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 48-1101 et seq. (Reissue 1993), because the employer does not employ the requisite 15 or more employees to be considered "an employer" under either act.”
Knapp v. Ruser, 297 Neb. 639 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 4× “The Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 48-1101 through 48-1126 (Reissue 2010), is patterned after federal title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.”
Airport Inn, Inc. v. Nebraska Equal Opportunity Comm'n, 353 N.W.2d 727 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 6× “, discriminated against the appellee Michael Sump because of his sex, in violation of the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act (NFEPA), Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 48-1101 to 48-1125 (Reissue 1978).”
Helvering v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 703 N.W.2d 134 (Neb. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 3× “(b) Discrimination Claims The Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act (FEPA), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 48-1101 to 48-1126 (Reissue 2004), furthers “the *830 policy of [Nebraska] to foster the employment of all employable persons in the state on the basis of merit.”
Bluff's Vision Clinic, P.C. v. Krzyzanowski, 555 N.W.2d 556 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 10× “(Bluff's), for employment discrimination pursuant to the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act (Act), Neb. Rev.Stat. § 48-1101 et seq. (Reissue 1993).”
Kristin Jones v. Douglas Cnty. Sheriff's Dept., 915 F.3d 498 (8th Cir. 2019). “§ 12101 - 12213 ; and the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act (NFEPA), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1101 to 1126. The district court 1 dismissed her claims as time-barred.”
Marshall v. EyeCare Specialties, 876 N.W.2d 372 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 3× “In its analysis, the court concluded that Marshall had not presented any direct evidence that EyeCare Specialties 2 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 48-1101 to 48-1125 (Reissue 2010 & Cum.”
Pierce v. Landmark Mgmt. Grp., 880 N.W.2d 885 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 2× “Paladino; [the employers] operate out of shared office space located at 2702 Douglas Street, Omaha, NE 68131; all billing 3 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1101 et seq. (Reissue 2010).”
Hill v. AMMC, Inc., 300 Neb. 412 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 2× “CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, the wrongful discharge claim asserted in Hill's 2017 complaint is barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion.”
Haffke v. Signal 88, 306 Neb. 625 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 3× “Finally, Haffke claims the district 1 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 48-1101 to 48-1126 (Reissue 2010 & Cum.”
Show all 153 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.