Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 60
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-435 (2026)

Transferred to section 81-2005

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-435.

Transferred to section 81-2005.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1940–1986 · leading case: State v. Kretchmar, 267 N.W.2d 740 (Neb. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Kretchmar, 267 N.W.2d 740 (Neb. 1978). · cites it 32× “The stop in this case resulted from an intuitive feeling on the part of the trooper that the driver of the vehicle did not fit the late model vehicle he was driving, and that a check should be made to ascertain whether or not the vehicle might possibly have been stolen.”
State v. Holmberg, 231 N.W.2d 672 (Neb. 1975). · cites it 28× “Reliance to make the stop is based solely upon section 60-435, R.R.S.1943, which provides in part as follows: "* * * all members of the Nebraska State Patrol * * * shall have the power * * * (4) when in uniform, to require the driver thereof to stop and exhibit his operator's…”
State v. Colgrove, 253 N.W.2d 20 (Neb. 1977). · cites it 12× “The admitted purpose here was to determine, for some reason which the record does not disclose, the identity of the car's occupants.”
State v. Benson, 251 N.W.2d 659 (Neb. 1977). · cites it 4× “There was, therefore, authority for the stop of defendant's vehicle aside from the radio direction.”
State v. Crom, 383 N.W.2d 461 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 4× “Prouse, supra , it had been the law in this state, both by statute and by the decisions of this court, that a peace officer could stop any motor vehicle at any time and require the operator to exhibit his or her operator's license and the registration for the vehicle.”
State v. Shepardson, 235 N.W.2d 218 (Neb. 1975). · cites it 8× “It is only when, as here, the officer becomes aware of a reasonable probability of a law violation that the driver may be detained for further questioning.”
Beisner v. Cochran, 293 N.W. 289 (Neb. 1940). “This is a suit brought by plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, to obtain a declaration of the rights, status and legal relations of the parties under sections 60-435 to 60-444, Comp. St. Supp.”
State v. Embrey, 198 N.W.2d 322 (Neb. 1972). · cites it 2× “The provisions of section 60-435 or section 60-437, R. R. S.”
Pfeifer v. Ableidinger, 89 N.W.2d 568 (Neb. 1958). “This was a suit for a declaration of the rights and legal relations of the parties under sections 60-435 to 60-444, Comp. *478 St.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-435(4): 1 case
State v. Shepardson, 235 N.W.2d 218 (Neb. 1975). “It is only when, as here, the officer becomes aware of a reasonable probability of a law violation that the driver may be detained for further questioning.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.