No such policy or bond shall be effective under section 60-508 unless issued by an insurance company or surety company authorized to do business in this state, except that if such motor vehicle was not registered in this state or was a motor vehicle which was registered elsewhere than in this state at the effective date of a policy or bond or the most recent renewal thereof, such policy or bond shall not be effective under section 60-508 unless the insurance company or surety company, if not authorized to do business in this state, shall execute an acknowledgment that the company shall be amenable to process issued by a court of this state in any action upon such policy or bond arising out of such accident. Every such policy or bond is subject, if the accident has resulted in bodily injury, sickness, disease, or death, to a limit, exclusive of interest and costs, of not less than twenty-five thousand dollars because of bodily injury to or death of one person in any one accident and, subject to such limit for one person, to a limit of not less than fifty thousand dollars because of bodily injury to or death of two or more persons in any one accident and, if the accident has resulted in injury to or destruction of property, to a limit of not less than twenty-five thousand dollars because of injury to or destruction of property of others in any one accident. Upon receipt of a notice of such accident, the insurance company or surety company which issued such policy or bond shall furnish, for filing with the department, a written notice that such policy or bond was in effect at the time of such accident.
Notes of Decisions
Pettid Ex Rel. Pettid v. Edwards, 240 N.W.2d 344 (Neb. 1976).
· cites it 12× “1943, provides that: "No policy insuring against loss resulting from liability imposed by law for bodily injury or death suffered by any person arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of a motor vehicle shall be delivered or issued for delivery in this state with…”
Lane v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 308 N.W.2d 503 (Neb. 1981).
· cites it 8× “The required minimum coverage limits of such policies are set out in Neb.Rev.Stat. § 60-509 (Reissue 1978). In support of its position that the insured motorist must first obtain a judgment against the uninsured motorist as a condition precedent to bringing suit against the…”
Charley v. Farmers Mut. Ins. Co. of Nebraska, 366 N.W.2d 417 (Neb. 1985).
· cites it 8× “unless coverage is provided therein or supplemental thereto, in limits for bodily injury or death set forth in section 60-509, under provisions approved by the Director of Insurance, for the protection of persons insured thereunder who are legally entitled to recover damages…”
Crossley v. Pac. Employers Ins., 251 N.W.2d 383 (Neb. 1977).
· cites it 4× “It is conceded that the insurance coverage on the Colorado automobile not only complied with all the provisions of the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act, but afforded the coverage and limits for personal injury specified by section 60-509, R. R. S. 1943. Had the accident…”
Kracl v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 374 N.W.2d 40 (Neb. 1985).
· cites it 4× “2d 621 (1981), anyone purchasing uninsured motorist coverage is not limited to the amount stated in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-509 (Reissue 1984). The statute states only the minimum amount of coverage required.”
Grace v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 246 N.W.2d 874 (Neb. 1976).
· cites it 4× “posed by law for bodily injury or death suffered by any person arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of a motor vehicle shall be delivered or issued for delivery in this state with respect to any motor vehicle registered or principally garaged in this state unless…”
Brodersen v. Traders Ins., 523 N.W.2d 24 (Neb. 1994).
· cites it 7× “ts for bodily injury or death set forth in section 60-509, under provisions approved by the Director of Insurance, for the protection of persons insured thereunder who are legally entitled to recover damages from owners or operators of uninsured motor vehicles and hit-and-run…”
Botsch v. Reisdorff, 226 N.W.2d 121 (Neb. 1975).
· cites it 2× “See § 60-509, R.R.S.1943. Moreover, the fact that a significant number of drivers do not have any liability insurance is evident by section 60-509.”
Wroblewski v. Pearson, 313 N.W.2d 231 (Neb. 1981).
· cites it 2× “This amount was determined in accordance with the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 60-509 and 60-513 (Reissue 1978).”
Belek v. Travelers Indem. Co., 191 N.W.2d 819 (Neb. 1971).
· cites it 2× “As we read the record there is no contention that Travelers filed an SR-21 under the alternative provisions of the statute contained in section 60-509, R. R. S. 1943, as follows: “Upon receipt of a notice of such accident, the insurance company or surety company which issued…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.