Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 75
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-613 (2026)

Transferred to section 86-136

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

75-613.

Transferred to section 86-136.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1972–2019 · leading case: Hartman v. Glenwood Tel. Membership Corp., 249 N.W.2d 468 (Neb. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hartman v. Glenwood Tel. Membership Corp., 249 N.W.2d 468 (Neb. 1977). · cites it 25× “Section 75-613 provides as follows: “Upon the completion of the hearing on such am application, if a hearing is required, the State Railway Commission *363 may grant the application, in whole or in part, if the evidence establishes all of the following: (1) That such applicant…”
Jantzen v. Diller Tel. Co., 511 N.W.2d 504 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 5× “§ 75-613 (Reissue 1990): Upon the completion of the hearing on such an application, if a hearing is required, the [PSC] may grant the application, in whole or in part, if the evidence establishes all of the following: (1) That such applicant or applicants are not receiving, and…”
Reis v. Glenwood Tel. Membership Corp., 274 N.W.2d 539 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 15× “Section 75-613, R. R. S. 1943, provides that the commission may grant such an application “if the evidence establishes all of the following: “(1) That such applicant or applicants are not receiving, and will not within a reasonable time receive, reasonably adequate exchange…”
George Farm Co. v. Ne. Nebraska Tel. Co., 443 N.W.2d 285 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 3× “Following the hearing, the commission, relying on § 75-613, which states that before granting an application the commission must find that the applicant is not receiving reasonably adequate service, denied the application based on a statement by Leland George that the existing…”
In re Application No. C-4981, 27 Neb. Ct. App. 773 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 4× “Clearly, the Legislature’s amendments were meant to account for technological advancements, and it did not find it necessary (at least at that time) to amend the language at issue here.”
Schoen v. Am. Commc'n Co., 199 N.W.2d 716 (Neb. 1972). · cites it 2× “See §§ 75-613 and 75-614, R. R. S. 1943. Schoen did not allege manipulation of the exchange rate of $.”
Ochsner v. Glenwood Tel. Membership Corp., 344 N.W.2d 632 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 8× “Several assignments of error are presented, but only one issue is involved, the effect of the amendment of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-613 (Reissue 1981) by 1982 Neb.”
Reis v. Glenwood Tel. Membership Corp., 299 N.W.2d 771 (Neb. 1980). · cites it 7× “After a hearing, the commission granted the applications and held that the applicants had met the requirements of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-613 (Reissue 1976). The telephone company appealed.”
Mickow Corp. v. Pierce Tel. Co., 316 N.W.2d 66 (Neb. 1982). · cites it 3× “rates as are fair and equitable and will reimburse the affected company for any necessary loss of investment in existing property as determined by the Public Service Commission.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-613(1): 4 cases
Jantzen v. Diller Tel. Co., 511 N.W.2d 504 (Neb. 1994). “§ 75-613 (Reissue 1990): Upon the completion of the hearing on such an application, if a hearing is required, the [PSC] may grant the application, in whole or in part, if the evidence establishes all of the following: (1) That such applicant or applicants are not receiving, and…”
George Farm Co. v. Ne. Nebraska Tel. Co., 443 N.W.2d 285 (Neb. 1989). “Following the hearing, the commission, relying on § 75-613, which states that before granting an application the commission must find that the applicant is not receiving reasonably adequate service, denied the application based on a statement by Leland George that the existing…”
In re Application No. C-4981, 27 Neb. Ct. App. 773 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019). “Clearly, the Legislature’s amendments were meant to account for technological advancements, and it did not find it necessary (at least at that time) to amend the language at issue here.”
Ochsner v. Glenwood Tel. Membership Corp., 344 N.W.2d 632 (Neb. 1984). “Several assignments of error are presented, but only one issue is involved, the effect of the amendment of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-613 (Reissue 1981) by 1982 Neb.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-613(2): 2 cases
Reis v. Glenwood Tel. Membership Corp., 299 N.W.2d 771 (Neb. 1980). “After a hearing, the commission granted the applications and held that the applicants had met the requirements of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-613 (Reissue 1976). The telephone company appealed.”
Mickow Corp. v. Pierce Tel. Co., 316 N.W.2d 66 (Neb. 1982). “rates as are fair and equitable and will reimburse the affected company for any necessary loss of investment in existing property as determined by the Public Service Commission.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-613(4): 1 case
Jantzen v. Diller Tel. Co., 511 N.W.2d 504 (Neb. 1994). “§ 75-613 (Reissue 1990): Upon the completion of the hearing on such an application, if a hearing is required, the [PSC] may grant the application, in whole or in part, if the evidence establishes all of the following: (1) That such applicant or applicants are not receiving, and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.