Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 76
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-1446 (2026)

Trial; judgment; limitation; writ of restitution; issuance

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Trial of the action for possession shall be held not less than ten nor more than fourteen days after the issuance of the summons. The action shall be tried by the court without a jury. If the plaintiff serves the summons in the manner provided in section 76-1442.01, the action shall proceed as other actions for possession except that a money judgment shall not be granted for the plaintiff. If judgment is rendered against the defendant for the restitution of the premises, the court shall declare the forfeiture of the rental agreement, and shall, at the request of the plaintiff or his or her attorney, issue a writ of restitution, directing the constable or sheriff to restore possession of the premises to the plaintiff on a specified date not more than ten days after issuance of the writ of restitution. The plaintiff shall comply with the Disposition of Personal Property Landlord and Tenant Act and subsection (5) of section 76-1414 in the removal of personal property remaining on the premises at the time possession of the premises is restored.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2023–2024 · leading case: NP Dodge Mgmt. Co. v. Holcomb, 993 N.W.2d 105 (Neb. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
NP Dodge Mgmt. Co. v. Holcomb, 993 N.W.2d 105 (Neb. 2023). · cites it 12× “Eihusen, 272 Neb. 462, 466 , 723 N.W.2d 60, 63 (2006).”
Johnson v. Vosberg, 6 N.W.3d 216 (Neb. 2024). · cites it 3× “Thus, while the URLTA contemplates that “other causes of action relating to the tenancy” may be joined in the complaint, there is an expedited process for litigating the claim for possession separately from those other causes of action.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.