Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 81
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-2032 (2026)

Retirement system; funds; exemption from legal process; exception

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

All annuities or benefits which any person shall be entitled to receive under the Nebraska State Patrol Retirement Act shall not be subject to garnishment, attachment, levy, the operation of bankruptcy or insolvency laws, or any other process of law whatsoever and shall not be assignable except to the extent that such annuities or benefits are subject to a qualified domestic relations order under the Spousal Pension Rights Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2012–2014 · leading case: Anthis v. Copland, 270 P.3d 574 (Wash. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Anthis v. Copland, 270 P.3d 574 (Wash. 2012). · cites it 2× “at 229 (quoting Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-2032 ). *780 ¶49 The court rejected J.”
J.M. v. Hobbs, No. S-13-616 (Neb. July 18, 2014). · cites it 22× “SUMMARY Before 2012, under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-2032 (Reissue 2008), a Nebraska State Patrol officer’s retirement assets had absolute protection from “garnishment, attachment, levy, the operation of bankruptcy or insolvency laws, or any other process of law.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-2032(1): 1 case
J.M. v. Hobbs, No. S-13-616 (Neb. July 18, 2014). “SUMMARY Before 2012, under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-2032 (Reissue 2008), a Nebraska State Patrol officer’s retirement assets had absolute protection from “garnishment, attachment, levy, the operation of bankruptcy or insolvency laws, or any other process of law.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-2032(2): 1 case
J.M. v. Hobbs, No. S-13-616 (Neb. July 18, 2014). “SUMMARY Before 2012, under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-2032 (Reissue 2008), a Nebraska State Patrol officer’s retirement assets had absolute protection from “garnishment, attachment, levy, the operation of bankruptcy or insolvency laws, or any other process of law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.