Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 86
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 86-271 (2026)

Definitions, where found

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

For purposes of sections 86-271 to 86-2,115, unless the context otherwise requires, the definitions found in sections 86-272 to 86-289 apply.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2014–2019 · leading case: State v. Knutson, 852 N.W.2d 307 (Neb. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Knutson, 852 N.W.2d 307 (Neb. 2014). · cites it 2× “39 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 86-271 to 86-2,115 (Reissue 2008 & Cum.”
State v. Brye, 935 N.W.2d 438 (Neb. 2019). “Brye contends that by seeking the Attorney General’s recommendation prior to submitting the application to the court, the State failed to adhere to the requirement under § 86-291 that - 505 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 304 Nebraska Reports STATE v.”
State v. Russell, No. A-17-881 (Neb. Ct. App. Nov. 6, 2018). · cites it 2× “-3- Russell’s motion claimed his trial counsel provided deficient performance by “failing to properly investigate, research, prepare, file, and conduct an evidentiary hearing on the issue of the wiretaps of phone conversations and text messages” obtained in violation of Neb.…”
Russell v. Frakes, No. 8:19-cv-00213 (D. Neb. Oct. 28, 2019). · cites it 2× “for clarity, Petitioner raises the following claim in his habeas corpus petition: Petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments because counsel failed to properly investigate, research, prepare, and file a motion to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.