Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 9
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-301 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 9-301 to 9-356 shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Pickle Card Lottery Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases, 1970–2010 · leading case: Cent. States Found. v. Balka, 590 N.W.2d 832 (Neb. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cent. States Found. v. Balka, 590 N.W.2d 832 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 2× “FACTUAL BACKGROUND The Nebraska Pickle Card Lottery Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 9-301 through 9-356 (Reissue 1997), provides for licensed nonprofit organizations to raise revenue by selling pickle cards.”
Credit Bureau of Broken Bow, Inc. v. Moninger, 284 N.W.2d 855 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 5× “In effect, the Bureau is relying on section 9-301, U. C. C., which relates to the relative priorities as between unperfected security interests and lien creditors.”
Se. Rural Volunteer Fire Dep't v. Nebraska Dep't of Revenue, 560 N.W.2d 436 (Neb. 1997). · cites it 2× “1996), and the Nebraska Pickle Card Lottery Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 9-301 through 9-356 (Reissue 1991 & Cum.”
B. E. Implement Co. v. Valley Farm, Inc., 343 N.W.2d 892 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 3× “Section 9-301 provides in part as follows: “(1) .”
Sw. Bank of Omaha v. Moritz, 277 N.W.2d 430 (Neb. 1979). “” § 9-301 (3), U. C. C. The requisites of a sufficient financing statement are prescribed by section 9-402, U.”
Lone Oak Farm Corp. v. Riverside Fertilizer Co., 428 N.W.2d 175 (Neb. 1988). “In its fourth assignment of error appellant contends that, at best, the landlord was an unsecured creditor of the tenant and that such an interest is subordinate to Riverside’s secured interest under §§ 9-301 and 9-312 (Reissue 1980). The landlord argues that it is entitled to…”
In re MBA Poultry, L.L.C., 261 B.R. 9 (D. Neb. 2001). · cites it 4× “§ 9-301(3) to mean "a creditor who has acquired a lien on the property involved by attachment, levy, or the like.”
Antelope Cnty. Farmers Coop. Ass'n v. Citizens State Bank, 484 N.W.2d 822 (Neb. 1992). “§ 9-301 (Cum. Supp. 1988). Both Co-op and the Bank are perfected secured creditors for an amount which exceeds the value of the property.”
Lol Fin. Co. v. Paul Johnson & Sons Cattle Co., 758 F. Supp. 2d 871 (D. Neb. 2010). · cites it 7× “UCC § 9-301(1). Maverick is a South Dakota corporation, and its principal place of business also is located in South Dakota.”
Cromwell v. Ward, 219 N.W.2d 446 (Neb. 1974). · cites it 2× “See § 9-301 U.C.C. In fact the record is clear that they did not purchase the property, either from the plaintiff or Iske, or anyone else; nor did they claim to do so.”
Matter of Moriarty, 22 B.R. 689 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1982). “§ 9-301(l)(b), the rights of a creditor with an unperfected security interest are subordinate to the rights of a lien creditor who becomes such before the security interest is perfected.”
Cessna Fin. Corp. v. Millard Aviation, Inc. (In re Turner), 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981). · cites it 2× “§§ 9-301 and 9-306(3)(b) provide that a lien creditor without notice that the funds in the account were proceeds could not prevail against the secured party.”
Show all 19 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-301(1) — 2 cases
B. E. Implement Co. v. Valley Farm, Inc., 343 N.W.2d 892 (Neb. 1984). “Section 9-301 provides in part as follows: “(1) .”
Lol Fin. Co. v. Paul Johnson & Sons Cattle Co., 758 F. Supp. 2d 871 (D. Neb. 2010). “UCC § 9-301(1). Maverick is a South Dakota corporation, and its principal place of business also is located in South Dakota.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-301(2) — 3 cases
Lol Fin. Co. v. Paul Johnson & Sons Cattle Co., 758 F. Supp. 2d 871 (D. Neb. 2010). “UCC § 9-301(1). Maverick is a South Dakota corporation, and its principal place of business also is located in South Dakota.”
Cessna Fin. Corp. v. Millard Aviation, Inc. (In re Turner), 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981). “§§ 9-301 and 9-306(3)(b) provide that a lien creditor without notice that the funds in the account were proceeds could not prevail against the secured party.”
Matter of Turner, 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-301(3) — 2 cases
In re MBA Poultry, L.L.C., 261 B.R. 9 (D. Neb. 2001). “§ 9-301(3) to mean "a creditor who has acquired a lien on the property involved by attachment, levy, or the like.”
In Re Mba Poultry, LLC, 261 B.R. 9 (D. Neb. 2001).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-301(4) — 2 cases
In re MBA Poultry, L.L.C., 261 B.R. 9 (D. Neb. 2001). “§ 9-301(3) to mean "a creditor who has acquired a lien on the property involved by attachment, levy, or the like.”
In Re Mba Poultry, LLC, 261 B.R. 9 (D. Neb. 2001).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-301(b) — 1 case
Sanchez v. First Nat'l Bank in Morrill (In re Fix), 172 B.R. 61 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1994).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-301(l)(b) — 2 cases
Matter of Moriarty, 22 B.R. 689 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1982). “§ 9-301(l)(b), the rights of a creditor with an unperfected security interest are subordinate to the rights of a lien creditor who becomes such before the security interest is perfected.”
Siemers v. AG Servs. of Am., Inc. (In Re Siemers), 249 B.R. 205 (Bankr. D. Neb. 2000).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.