Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-302 (2026)

Purposes of act

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The purpose of the Nebraska Pickle Card Lottery Act is to protect the health and welfare of the public, to protect the economic welfare and interest in pickle card sales and winnings, to insure that the profits derived from the operation of lottery by the sale of pickle cards are accurately reported in order that their revenue-raising potential be fully exposed, to insure that the profits are used for legitimate purposes, and to prevent the purposes for which the profits of lottery by the sale of pickle cards are to be used from being subverted by improper elements. Lottery by the sale of pickle cards shall be played and conducted only by those methods permitted in the Nebraska Pickle Card Lottery Act. No other form, means of selection, or method of play shall be authorized or permitted.

(2) The purpose of the Nebraska Pickle Card Lottery Act is also to completely and fairly regulate each level of the traditional marketing scheme of pickle cards to insure fairness, quality, and compliance with the Constitution of the State of Nebraska. To accomplish such purpose, the regulation and licensure of manufacturers of pickle cards, nonprofit organizations, distributors, sales agents, pickle card operators, and any other person involved in the marketing scheme are necessary.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases, 1970–2010 · leading case: Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. First Natonal Bank of Wayne (In re Ellingson Motors, Inc.), 139 B.R. 919 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1991).
Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. First Natonal Bank of Wayne (In re Ellingson Motors, Inc.), 139 B.R. 919 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1991). · cites it 10× “§ 9-302(3), which exempted from the filing provisions of the Code those security interests in property which are subject to a statute of the state “which provides for central filing of, or which requires either retained possession of manufacturer’s certificate of origin or…”
Went v. Rhoden Nissan/Auto Fin. Ctr., 179 B.R. 889 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1995). · cites it 9× “Third, UCC § 9-302(2), which deals with assignment in a different context, is superseded by certificate of title laws, and, even if applicable, would not mandate a different result.”
Cent. States Found. v. Balka, 590 N.W.2d 832 (Neb. 1999). “302(1), in relevant part: The purpose of the Nebraska Pickle Card Lottery Act is to protect the health and welfare of the public, to protect the economic welfare and interest in pickle card sales and winnings, to insure that the profits derived from the operation of lottery by…”
In Re Nickerson & Nickerson, Inc., 329 F. Supp. 93 (D. Neb. 1971). · cites it 2× “Section 9-302 of the Code as adopted in the above states provides that “a financing statement must be filed to perfect all security interests except” some eight described forms of security interests.”
Green Tree Fin. Servicing Corp. v. Sutton, 650 N.W.2d 228 (Neb. 2002). “if a notation of the same has been made by the county clerk or the Department of Motor Vehicles on the face thereof, shall be valid as against the creditors of the debtor, whether armed with process or not, and subsequent purchasers, secured parties, and other lienholders or…”
Sw. Bank of Omaha v. Moritz, 277 N.W.2d 430 (Neb. 1979). “§ 9-302, U. C. C. An unperfected security interest is subordinate to, among others, a ‘‘lien creditor,” which term includes ‘‘a trustee in bankruptcy from the date of the filing of the petition.”
Circle 76 Fertilizer, Inc. v. Nelsen, 365 N.W.2d 460 (Neb. 1985). “Mid-State next questions the priority of the bank’s security interest over its petroleum products lien.”
Platte Valley Bank of North Bend v. Kracl, 174 N.W.2d 724 (Neb. 1970). · cites it 2× “, since financing statements were filed pursuant to section 9-302 (1), U. C. C., and the interest has attached under section 9-204 (1), U.”
State v. Jones, 453 N.W.2d 447 (Neb. 1990). “§§ 9-302 et seq. (Reissue 1980). Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code is not relevant in this case, notwithstanding defendant’s assertion to the contrary.”
B. E. Implement Co. v. Valley Farm, Inc., 343 N.W.2d 892 (Neb. 1984). “” Finally, § 9-302 provides that a ‘‘financing statement must be filed to perfect all security interests,” with exceptions not applicable to the present situation.”
Genoa Nat'l Bank v. Sorensen, 304 N.W.2d 659 (Neb. 1981). “Such steps are specified in sections 9-302, 9-304, 9-305 and 9-306. If such steps are taken before the security interest attaches, it is perfected at the time when it attaches.”
Home Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. McDermott & Miller, 449 N.W.2d 12 (Neb. 1989). “§ 9-302 (Reissue 1980) (filing to perfect security interest).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-302(1) — 1 case
Cent. States Found. v. Balka, 590 N.W.2d 832 (Neb. 1999). “302(1), in relevant part: The purpose of the Nebraska Pickle Card Lottery Act is to protect the health and welfare of the public, to protect the economic welfare and interest in pickle card sales and winnings, to insure that the profits derived from the operation of lottery by…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-302(2) — 2 cases
Went v. Rhoden Nissan/Auto Fin. Ctr., 179 B.R. 889 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1995). “Third, UCC § 9-302(2), which deals with assignment in a different context, is superseded by certificate of title laws, and, even if applicable, would not mandate a different result.”
Matter of Union Packing Co. of Omaha, 62 B.R. 96 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1986).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-302(3) — 2 cases
Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. First Natonal Bank of Wayne (In re Ellingson Motors, Inc.), 139 B.R. 919 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1991). “§ 9-302(3), which exempted from the filing provisions of the Code those security interests in property which are subject to a statute of the state “which provides for central filing of, or which requires either retained possession of manufacturer’s certificate of origin or…”
Went v. Rhoden Nissan/Auto Fin. Ctr., 179 B.R. 889 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1995). “Third, UCC § 9-302(2), which deals with assignment in a different context, is superseded by certificate of title laws, and, even if applicable, would not mandate a different result.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-302(3)(a) — 2 cases
Matter of Turner, 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-302(3)(b) — 2 cases
Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. First Natonal Bank of Wayne (In re Ellingson Motors, Inc.), 139 B.R. 919 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1991). “§ 9-302(3), which exempted from the filing provisions of the Code those security interests in property which are subject to a statute of the state “which provides for central filing of, or which requires either retained possession of manufacturer’s certificate of origin or…”
Green Tree Fin. Servicing Corp. v. Sutton, 650 N.W.2d 228 (Neb. 2002). “if a notation of the same has been made by the county clerk or the Department of Motor Vehicles on the face thereof, shall be valid as against the creditors of the debtor, whether armed with process or not, and subsequent purchasers, secured parties, and other lienholders or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.