Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-304 (2026)

Allowable expenses, defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Allowable expenses shall mean:

(1) All costs associated with the purchasing, printing, or manufacturing of any items to be used or distributed to participants;

(2) All office expenses;

(3) All promotional expenses;

(4) All salaries of persons employed to operate the lottery by the sale of pickle cards;

(5) Any rental or lease expense;

(6) Any fee paid to any person associated with the operation of any lottery by the sale of pickle cards, including any commission paid to a sales agent and any expense for which a sales agent is reimbursed;

(7) Any delivery or shipping charge incurred by a licensed organization in connection with the lottery by the sale of pickle cards;

(8) Any license fees paid to the department to license the organization, each utilization-of-funds member, and each sales agent and any pickle card dispensing device registration fees paid to the department to register devices utilized at the licensed organization's designated premises or its bingo occasions; and

(9) Any pickle card dispensing device repairs or maintenance paid by the licensed organization.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1981–1994 · leading case: Larsen v. First Bank, 515 N.W.2d 804 (Neb. 1994).
Larsen v. First Bank, 515 N.W.2d 804 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 2× “” The net effect of §§ 9-304 and 9-305, then, is to permit a *965 bailee to take possession of an instrument for the benefit of a secured party.”
Chadron Energy Corp. v. First Nat'l Bank, 379 N.W.2d 742 (Neb. 1986). “§ 9-304(5) (Reissue 1980) specifically contemplates such an action and provides: A security interest remains perfected for a period of twenty-one days without filing where a secured party having a perfected security interest in an instrument.”
Cessna Fin. Corp. v. Millard Aviation, Inc. (In re Turner), 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981). “§ 9-304(1). The parties have listed as controverted issues questions of whether plaintiff consented to the sale and whether the airplane was inventory of Millard.”
Matter of Turner, 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981). “§ 9-304(1). The parties have listed as controverted issues questions of whether plaintiff consented to the sale and whether the airplane was inventory of Millard.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-304(1) — 3 cases
Larsen v. First Bank, 515 N.W.2d 804 (Neb. 1994). “” The net effect of §§ 9-304 and 9-305, then, is to permit a *965 bailee to take possession of an instrument for the benefit of a secured party.”
Cessna Fin. Corp. v. Millard Aviation, Inc. (In re Turner), 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981). “§ 9-304(1). The parties have listed as controverted issues questions of whether plaintiff consented to the sale and whether the airplane was inventory of Millard.”
Matter of Turner, 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981). “§ 9-304(1). The parties have listed as controverted issues questions of whether plaintiff consented to the sale and whether the airplane was inventory of Millard.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-304(5) — 1 case
Chadron Energy Corp. v. First Nat'l Bank, 379 N.W.2d 742 (Neb. 1986). “§ 9-304(5) (Reissue 1980) specifically contemplates such an action and provides: A security interest remains perfected for a period of twenty-one days without filing where a secured party having a perfected security interest in an instrument.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.