Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 9
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-306 (2026)

Department, defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Department shall mean the Department of Revenue.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1969–2025 · leading case: Battle Creek State Bank v. Haake, 587 N.W.2d 83 (Neb. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Battle Creek State Bank v. Haake, 587 N.W.2d 83 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 51× “As amended, that section now provides as set forth below with the amendatory terms italicized as follows: Except where this article otherwise provides, a security interest continues in collateral notwithstanding sale, exchange or other disposition thereof unless the disposition…”
Chadron Energy Corp. v. First Nat'l Bank, 459 N.W.2d 718 (Neb. 1990). · cites it 11× “Section 9-306(2) provides: Except where this article otherwise provides, a security interest continues in collateral notwithstanding sale, exchange or other disposition thereof unless the disposition was authorized by the secured party in the security agreement or otherwise, and…”
Farmers State Bank v. Farmland Foods, Inc., 402 N.W.2d 277 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 18× “§ 9-306(2) (Reissue 1980), which states: Except where this article otherwise provides, a security interest continues in collateral notwithstanding sale, exchange or other disposition thereof unless the disposition was authorized by the secured party in the security agreement or…”
Garden City Prod. Credit Assn. v. Lannan, 186 N.W.2d 99 (Neb. 1971). · cites it 18× “Section 9-306(2), U.C.C., provides: "Except where this article otherwise provides, a security interest continues in collateral notwithstanding sale, exchange or other disposition thereof by the debtor unless his action was authorized by the secured party in the security…”
Terra W. Corp. v. Berry & Co., 295 N.W.2d 693 (Neb. 1980). · cites it 6× “The petition did not allege that the policy of insurance contained a loss payable clause in favor of the mortgagee, or that Berry or Alliance had any actual notice of Terra’s *31 lien on the crop, or that Alliance made payment to Temme with notice of his contractual agreement to…”
Norfolk Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Bank of Norfolk, 371 N.W.2d 276 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 12× ““As previously discussed, the Uniform Commercial Code is explicit in preserving the priority of the secured party to the proceeds notwithstanding his consent to the sale of the primary collateral and further notwithstanding his consent to the debtor’s unrestricted use and…”
Five Points Bank v. Scoular-Bishop Grain Co., 350 N.W.2d 549 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 3× “§ 9-306(2) (Reissue 1980), which states: Except where this article otherwise provides, a security interest continues in collateral notwithstanding sale, exchange or other disposition thereof unless the disposition was authorized by the secured party in the security agreement or…”
Chadron Energy Corp. v. First Nat'l Bank, 379 N.W.2d 742 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 3× “§ 9-306(2) (Reissue 1980) makes it clear that the transfer of the stock in First National-Chadron from the Wulf Group to the holding company did not in any manner diminish or extinguish the security interest held by the Shaffers or Kleman in the stock.”
Ag Servs. of Am., Inc. v. United Grain, Inc., 75 F. Supp. 2d 1037 (D. Neb. 1999). · cites it 7× “§ 9-306(2) (1998 Supp.) 16 is the governing law.”
Cent. States Found. v. Balka, 590 N.W.2d 832 (Neb. 1999). “See §§ 9-306 and 9-322. The primary function of this enforcement and regulation capacity is to ensure that pickle card revenues are used for lawful purposes, which may be generally described as purposes which are charitable or benefit the public welfare.”
State Bank, Palmer v. Scoular-Bishop Grain Co., 349 N.W.2d 912 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 2× “§ 9-306(2) (Reissue 1980): Except where this article otherwise provides, a security interest continues in collateral notwithstanding sale, exchange or other disposition thereof unless the disposition was authorized by the secured party in the security agreement or otherwise, and…”
Matter of Selden, 58 B.R. 667 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1986). · cites it 3× “§ 9-306(2) (Reissue 1980) states: “Except where this article otherwise provides, a security interest continues in collateral notwithstanding sale, exchange or other disposition thereof unless the disposition was authorized by the secured party in the security agreement or…”
Show all 32 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-306(1) — 3 cases
Norfolk Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Bank of Norfolk, 371 N.W.2d 276 (Neb. 1985). ““As previously discussed, the Uniform Commercial Code is explicit in preserving the priority of the secured party to the proceeds notwithstanding his consent to the sale of the primary collateral and further notwithstanding his consent to the debtor’s unrestricted use and…”
Cessna Fin. Corp. v. Millard Aviation, Inc. (In re Turner), 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981).
Matter of Turner, 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-306(2) — 19 cases
Battle Creek State Bank v. Haake, 587 N.W.2d 83 (Neb. 1998). “As amended, that section now provides as set forth below with the amendatory terms italicized as follows: Except where this article otherwise provides, a security interest continues in collateral notwithstanding sale, exchange or other disposition thereof unless the disposition…”
Chadron Energy Corp. v. First Nat'l Bank, 459 N.W.2d 718 (Neb. 1990). “Section 9-306(2) provides: Except where this article otherwise provides, a security interest continues in collateral notwithstanding sale, exchange or other disposition thereof unless the disposition was authorized by the secured party in the security agreement or otherwise, and…”
Farmers State Bank v. Farmland Foods, Inc., 402 N.W.2d 277 (Neb. 1987). “§ 9-306(2) (Reissue 1980), which states: Except where this article otherwise provides, a security interest continues in collateral notwithstanding sale, exchange or other disposition thereof unless the disposition was authorized by the secured party in the security agreement or…”
Garden City Prod. Credit Assn. v. Lannan, 186 N.W.2d 99 (Neb. 1971). “Section 9-306(2), U.C.C., provides: "Except where this article otherwise provides, a security interest continues in collateral notwithstanding sale, exchange or other disposition thereof by the debtor unless his action was authorized by the secured party in the security…”
Norfolk Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Bank of Norfolk, 371 N.W.2d 276 (Neb. 1985). ““As previously discussed, the Uniform Commercial Code is explicit in preserving the priority of the secured party to the proceeds notwithstanding his consent to the sale of the primary collateral and further notwithstanding his consent to the debtor’s unrestricted use and…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-306(3) — 3 cases
United States v. Pirnie, 339 F. Supp. 702 (D. Neb. 1972).
Cessna Fin. Corp. v. Millard Aviation, Inc. (In re Turner), 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981).
Matter of Turner, 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-306(3)(b) — 2 cases
Cessna Fin. Corp. v. Millard Aviation, Inc. (In re Turner), 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981).
Matter of Turner, 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-306(4) — 2 cases
Cessna Fin. Corp. v. Millard Aviation, Inc. (In re Turner), 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981).
Matter of Turner, 13 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1981).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.