Determining substantial and injurious effect of error
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Determining substantial and injurious effect of error
- Cited for: Determining substantial influence of an error
- Cited for: Harmless error analysis of misjoinder of counts
- Cited for: Analyzing error types and olano's fourth prong
Ranked by how often Nevada courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Nevada opinions citing these pages
- Smith (sophia) v. State, 587 P.3d 251 (Nev. 2026)
- Talley (omar) v. State, 580 P.3d 101 (Nev. 2025)
- Pinney Jr. (kenneth) v. State, 560 P.3d 670 (Nev. 2024)
- Chadwick v. State, 546 P.3d 215 (Nev. 2024)
- Dickey v. State, 540 P.3d 442 (Nev. 2024)
- Alfaro v. State, 534 P.3d 138 (Nev. 2023)
- Young v. State, 534 P.3d 158 (Nev. 2023)
- Harris (ammar) Vs. State (death Penalty-direct), 2018 NV 107 (Nev. 2018)
- Hubbard (cory) Vs. State, 2018 NV 54 (Nev. 2018)
- Tabish v. State, 72 P.3d 584 (Nev. 2003)
- Tavares v. State, 30 P.3d 1128 (Nev. 2001)
- Knight v. State, 993 P.2d 67 (Nev. 2000)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 18 opinions
- 19 opinions
- 8 opinions
- 7 opinions
- 18 opinions
- 6 opinions
Filed under: Harmless and Plain Error Analysis
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law