Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.2715 (2026)

Buyer’s incidental and consequential damages

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 104.2715  Buyer’s incidental and consequential damages.

      1.  Incidental damages resulting from the seller’s breach include expenses reasonably incurred in inspection, receipt, transportation and care and custody of goods rightfully rejected, any commercially reasonable charges, expenses or commissions in connection with effecting cover and any other reasonable expense incident to the delay or other breach.

      2.  Consequential damages resulting from the seller’s breach include:

      (a) Any loss resulting from general or particular requirements and needs of which the seller at the time of contracting had reason to know and which could not reasonably be prevented by cover or otherwise; and

      (b) Injury to person or property proximately resulting from any breach of warranty.

      (Added to NRS by 1965, 814)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1977–2013 · leading case: Newmar Corp. v. McCrary, 309 P.3d 1021 (Nev. 2013).
Newmar Corp. v. McCrary, 309 P.3d 1021 (Nev. 2013). · cites it 2× “The pertinent UCC provision, NRS 104.2715, explicitly provides for the award of incidental and consequential damages.”
Cent. Bit Supply, Inc. v. Waldrop Drilling & Pump, Inc., 717 P.2d 35 (Nev. 1986). “” NRS 104.2715(2)(a). In the case at bar, the district court awarded consequential damages only.”
Hiles Co. v. Johnston Pump Co. of Pasadena, 560 P.2d 154 (Nev. 1977). “See: NRS 104.2715. We perceive no reason to distinguish between recovery for personal and property injury, on the one hand, and economic loss on the other.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.2715(2)(a): 1 case
Cent. Bit Supply, Inc. v. Waldrop Drilling & Pump, Inc., 717 P.2d 35 (Nev. 1986). “” NRS 104.2715(2)(a). In the case at bar, the district court awarded consequential damages only.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.