Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 11 - LIMITATION OF ACTIONS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.200 (2026)

Computation of time

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 11.200  Computation of time.

      1.  The time in NRS 11.190 shall be deemed to date from the last transaction or the last item charged or last credit given; and whenever any payment on principal or interest has been or shall be made upon an existing contract, whether it be a bill of exchange, promissory note or other evidence of indebtedness if such payment be made after the same shall have become due, the limitation shall commence from the time the last payment was made.

      2.  Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any payment on a debt, affirmation of a debt or other activity taken relating to a debt by a debtor after the time in NRS 11.190 has expired does not revive the applicable limitation.

      [1911 CPA § 26; RL § 4968; NCL § 8525]—(NRS A 2023, 3606)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1960–2025 · leading case: Stimpson v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc., 347 F. Supp. 3d 538 (D. Idaho 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stimpson v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc., 347 F. Supp. 3d 538 (D. Idaho 2018). · cites it 2× “This Agreement is entered into in Nevada, your Account is maintained in Nevada, and all credit under this Agreement will be extended from Nevada.”
Riff v. Kowal, 352 P.2d 819 (Nev. 1960). · cites it 5× ““No acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract whereby to take the case out of the operation of this chapter, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby, except as provided in NRS 11.200.”…”
Miller v. York, 548 P.2d 941 (Nev. 1976). · cites it 2× “NRS 11.200 is controlling on this issue. 3 The statute starts to run from the date the last or most recent interest payment was made.”
Havas v. Long, 454 P.2d 30 (Nev. 1969). · cites it 2× “2d 819 (1960), said that the phrase “existing contract,” mentioned in NRS 11.200 (the time-commencement statute), means an enforceable contract and that past payment of any sum on the debt, or credit given (absent written acknowledgment or new promise to pay, NRS 11.”
Goldberg v. Charter Med. Corp., 651 P.2d 94 (Nev. 1982). · cites it 2× “Respondent relies on NRS 11.200, and argues that the date of death should be included in the limitations period.”
Davidson Vs. Davidson, 2016 NV 71 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 16× “NRS 11.200 dictates that the limitations period commences -The Honorable Nancy M.”
Taber v. Exemplar Holdings, LLC (D. Nev. 2025). · cites it 11× “11 Plaintiff opposes on two grounds: (1) NRS § 11.200 dictates that actions accrue from the 12 date of the last item charged; and (2) Plaintiff’s compensation was due upon producing testable 13 screws, not monthly.”
Davidson Vs. Davidson, 2016 NV 71 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 8× “NRS 11.200 dictates that the limitations period commences -The Honorable Nancy M.”
Saye v. Paradise Mem'l Gardens, Inc., 554 P.2d 274 (Nev. 1976). “390 provides: “No acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract whereby to take the case out Of the operation of this chapter, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby, except as provided in…”
Taylor Bean & Whitaker Mortg. Corp. v. Vargas (Nev. 2017). · cites it 4× “1 Further, the court held that, pursuant to NRS 11.200, the computation of the statute of limitations commenced on the day of the last payment from Vargas.”
Reno Tech. Ctr. 1, LLC v. New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (D. Nev. 2019). · cites it 4× “In the Court’s summary 19 judgment order, the Court explained that NRS §11.200, which tolls the statute of limitations for 20 enforcing a debt when payment is made on an existing contract, is inapplicable in this case for two 21 separate reasons.”
Colpo Caldo LLC v. Ronald Trunk (D. Nev. 2021). · cites it 2× “16 NRS § 11.200 provides how the Court is to calculate time when considering the statute of 17 limitations: 18 The time in NRS 11.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.200(1) — 1 case
Karalis v. Carn (D. Nev. 2025).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.