Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 116 - COMMON-INTEREST OWNERSHIP (UNIFORM ACT)
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.1113 (2026)

Obligation of good faith

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 116.1113  Obligation of good faith.  Every contract or duty governed by this chapter imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 541)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 117 cases (23 in the last 5 years), 2013–2024 · leading case: Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Maplewood Springs Homeowners Ass'n, 238 F. Supp. 3d 1257 (D. Nev. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Maplewood Springs Homeowners Ass'n, 238 F. Supp. 3d 1257 (D. Nev. 2017). · cites it 7× “Nationstar contends that the notices prior to the HOA’s foreclosure sale violated NRS Chapter 116, that the HOA violated NRS 116.1113 by falsely promising its liens were subordinate to the senior deed of trust and thereafter failing to notify Nationstar that its security…”
Carrington Mortg. Servs., LLC v. Tapestry At Town Ctr. Homeowners Ass'n, 381 F. Supp. 3d 1289 (D. Nev. 2019). · cites it 3× “Therefore, Carrington's second cause of action for breach of NRS 116.1113 is entirely foreclosed, and its remaining causes of action for quiet title/declaratory relief, wrongful foreclosure, and injunctive relief are foreclosed only to the extent violations of NRS 116.”
Bank of Am. v. Arlington West Twilight Hoa, 920 F.3d 620 (9th Cir. 2019). “Bank of America sued Arlington West, Alessi & Koenig, and the Jessup entities, asserting claims for: (1) quiet title and declaratory judgment against all defendants; (2) breach of Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.1113 against Arlington West and Alessi & Koenig; and (3) wrongful foreclosure…”
U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC, 376 F. Supp. 3d 1085 (D. Nev. 2019). · cites it 5× “14 The bank pleads six causes of action: three quiet-title claims, all seeking a declaration that the deed of trust continues to encumber the property; a claim for "wrongful foreclosure"; one for violating NRS 116.1113 ; and an unjust-enrichment claim against SFR alone.”
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Falcon Point Ass'n, 347 F. Supp. 3d 592 (D. Nev. 2018). · cites it 4× “Plaintiff filed the instant Complaint on April 11, 2016, asserting the following causes of action arising from the foreclosure and subsequent sale of the Property: (1) quiet title against all Defendants; (2) Breach of NRS § 116.1113 against HOA and Red Rock; (3) wrongful…”
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Woodcrest Homeowners Ass'n, 381 F. Supp. 3d 1280 (D. Nev. 2019). · cites it 3× “6 to Airmotive's MSJ, ECF No. 39-6). BANA filed its Complaint on February 17, 2016, asserting the following causes of action arising from the foreclosure and sale of the Property: (1) quiet title; (2) breach of NRS 116.”
Saticoy Bay, LLC Ser. 9720 Hitching Rail Vs. Peccole Ranch Cmty. Ass'n, 2021 NV 52 (Nev. 2021). · cites it 4× “Saticoy Bay brought four claims: misrepresentation, breach of the duty of good faith under NRS 116.1113, conspiracy, and violation of NRS 113.”
McKnight Fam., LLP v. Adept Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 310 P.3d 555 (Nev. 2013). “341, 2 (6) violation of NRS 116.1113 and NRS 116.3103, and (7) slander of title/wrongful foreclosure/quiet title.”
Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Log Cabin Manor Homeowners Ass'n, 362 F. Supp. 3d 930 (D. Nev. 2019). · cites it 2× “Regarding BONY's claim for breach of the duty of good faith under NRS § 116.1113, the HOA argues that BONY lacks standing to pursue such a claim under NRS § 116.”
Nationstar Mortage LLC v. Springs Prop. Owners Ass'n, 309 F. Supp. 3d 868 (D. Nev. 2018). · cites it 5× “On August 24, 2016, Nationstar filed the underlying complaint, alleging four causes of action: quiet title against all defendants; breach of NRS 116.1113 against the HOA; wrongful foreclosure against the HOA; and injunctive relief against SFR.”
Bank of N.Y. v. S. Highlands Cmty. Ass'n, 329 F. Supp. 3d 1208 (D. Nev. 2018). “BONY also asserts the foreclosure was wrongful for reasons that are not necessarily based on statutory violations.”
Bank of N.Y. v. Foothills at MacDonald Ranch Master Ass'n, 329 F. Supp. 3d 1221 (D. Nev. 2018). “BONY also asserts the foreclosure was wrongful for reasons that are not necessarily based on statutory violations.”
Show all 117 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.