Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 125 - DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125.110 (2026)

What pleadings and papers open to public inspection; written request of party for sealing

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 125.110  What pleadings and papers open to public inspection; written request of party for sealing.  Repealed. (See chapter 505, Statutes of Nevada 2025, at page 3332.)

 

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2008–2024 · leading case: Johanson v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 182 P.3d 94 (Nev. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Johanson v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 182 P.3d 94 (Nev. 2008). · cites it 15× “In this petition, we consider whether the district court manifestly abused its discretion when it ordered the entire case file sealed, without making any findings under NRS 125.110, and prohibited all communication relating to the case, without providing notice or a meaningful…”
Howard v. State, 291 P.3d 137 (Nev. 2012). “District Court, we declined to consider whether a district court has inherent authority to completely seal a divorce case beyond the provisions of NRS 125.110, which permits the sealing of portions of the record in divorce cases, because the real party in interest had “failed to…”
Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Downes, No. 2:22-cv-00894 (D. Nev. Jan. 30, 2024). · cites it 6× “) See NRS § 125.110. The Court agrees with Shedd Defendants 13 that the minute orders are appropriate for judicial notice and not barred from such notice 14 merely because the Divorce Action is sealed.”
Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Downes, No. 2:22-cv-00894 (D. Nev. Sept. 25, 2023). · cites it 4× “In turn, the issue before this Court is whether NRS 125.110 prohibits 7 Karen Macaulay from testifying about documents that were sealed in her divorce proceeding 8 pursuant to that statute.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125.110(1)(b): 2 cases
Johanson v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 182 P.3d 94 (Nev. 2008). “In this petition, we consider whether the district court manifestly abused its discretion when it ordered the entire case file sealed, without making any findings under NRS 125.110, and prohibited all communication relating to the case, without providing notice or a meaningful…”
Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Downes, No. 2:22-cv-00894 (D. Nev. Sept. 25, 2023). “In turn, the issue before this Court is whether NRS 125.110 prohibits 7 Karen Macaulay from testifying about documents that were sealed in her divorce proceeding 8 pursuant to that statute.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125.110(2): 2 cases
Johanson v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 182 P.3d 94 (Nev. 2008). “In this petition, we consider whether the district court manifestly abused its discretion when it ordered the entire case file sealed, without making any findings under NRS 125.110, and prohibited all communication relating to the case, without providing notice or a meaningful…”
Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Downes, No. 2:22-cv-00894 (D. Nev. Jan. 30, 2024). “) See NRS § 125.110. The Court agrees with Shedd Defendants 13 that the minute orders are appropriate for judicial notice and not barred from such notice 14 merely because the Divorce Action is sealed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.