Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 130.105 (2026)

Applicability to support proceedings involving foreign orders, foreign tribunals or certain persons residing in foreign country; limitations

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 130.105  Applicability to support proceedings involving foreign orders, foreign tribunals or certain persons residing in foreign country; limitations.

      1.  A tribunal of this State shall apply this chapter to a support proceeding involving:

      (a) A foreign support order;

      (b) A foreign tribunal; or

      (c) An obligee, obligor or child residing in a foreign country.

      2.  A tribunal of this State that is requested to recognize and enforce a support order on the basis of comity may apply the procedural and substantive provisions of this chapter.

      3.  NRS 130.7011 to 130.713, inclusive, apply only to a support proceeding under the Convention. In such a proceeding, if a provision of NRS 130.7011 to 130.713, inclusive, is inconsistent with any other provision of this chapter, NRS 130.7011 to 130.713, inclusive, control.

      (Added to NRS by 2009, 119; A 2015, 895)

Article 2—Jurisdiction

Extended Personal Jurisdiction

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2017–2017 · leading case: Vaile Vs. Vaile c/w 61415, 2017 NV 30 (Nev. 2017).
Vaile Vs. Vaile c/w 61415, 2017 NV 30 (Nev. 2017). · cites it 2× “Thus, even if no party resides in 2 NRS 130.105 provides that tribunals in Nevada will apply NRS Chapter 130 to foreign support orders.”
Vaile Vs. Vaile c/w 61415, 2017 NV 30 (Nev. 2017). “Thus, even if no party resides in 2 NRS 130.105 provides that tribunals in Nevada will apply NRS Chapter 130 to foreign support orders.”
Vaile Vs. Vaile c/w 61415, 2017 NV 30 (Nev. 2017). “Thus, even if no party resides in 2 NRS 130.105 provides that tribunals in Nevada will apply NRS Chapter 130 to foreign support orders.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.