Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 130 - INTERJURISDICTIONAL ENFORCEMENT OF SUPPORT
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 130.206 (2026)

Enforcement and modification of child-support order by tribunal having continuing jurisdiction

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 130.206  Enforcement and modification of child-support order by tribunal having continuing jurisdiction.

      1.  A tribunal of this State that has issued a child-support order consistent with the law of this State may serve as an initiating tribunal to request a tribunal of another state to enforce:

      (a) The order if the order is the controlling order and has not been modified by a tribunal of another state that assumed jurisdiction pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act; or

      (b) A money judgment for arrears of support and interest on the order accrued before a determination that an order of a tribunal of another state is the controlling order.

      2.  A tribunal of this State having continuing jurisdiction over a support order may act as a responding tribunal to enforce the order.

      (Added to NRS by 1997, 2315; A 2007, 122; 2009, 128; 2015, 895)

Reconciliation of Multiple Orders

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Vaile v. Porsboll, 268 P.3d 1272 (Nev. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Vaile v. Porsboll, 268 P.3d 1272 (Nev. 2012). “Under these circumstances, the fact that the parties and the children do not reside in the issuing state does not divest the issuing state of jurisdiction to enforce its support order when that order is the controlling order and has not been modified by another state in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.