Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 164 - ADMINISTRATION OF TRUSTS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 164.005 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 164.005  Applicability of provisions of chapters 132, 153 and 155 of NRS regulating matters of estates.  When not otherwise inconsistent with the provisions of chapters 162 to 167, inclusive, of NRS, all of the provisions of chapters 132, 153 and 155 of NRS regulating the matters of estates:

      1.  Apply to proceedings relating to trusts, as appropriate; or

      2.  May be applied to supplement the provisions of chapters 162 to 167, inclusive, of NRS.

      (Added to NRS by 2001, 2351)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2006–2022 · leading case: Prestie v. Prestie, 138 P.3d 520 (Nev. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Prestie v. Prestie, 138 P.3d 520 (Nev. 2006). · cites it 6× “17 NRS Title 13 does not incorporate NRS Title 12 with respect to revocation of wills Scott argues that NRS Title 13 (trusts) bars Maria’s claim as an unintentionally omitted spouse under NRS Title 12 (wills) because NRS 164.005, by reference, contemplates the application of…”
Klabacka Vs. Nelson c/w 66772, 2017 NV 24 (Nev. 2017). · cites it 2× “116; see also NRS 164.005 (applying NRS 132.116 to trust proceedings under Title 13).”
In Re: Lenk Fam. Tr. (Nev. 2022). · cites it 2× “See also NRS 164.005. That statute allows for immediate appeal, within 30 days from service of notice of entry, from orders instructing personal representatives and trustees and from orders that grant an order for conveyance directing that persons in possession of estate…”
Klabacka Vs. Nelson c/w 66772, 2017 NV 24 (Nev. 2017). “116; see also NRS 164.005 (applying NRS 132.116 to trust proceedings under Title 13).”
Klabacka Vs. Nelson c/w 66772, 2017 NV 24 (Nev. 2017). “116; see also NRS 164.005 (applying NRS 132.116 to trust proceedings under Title 13).”
Rogler v. Millard (Nev. 2014). “185; NRS 164.005; Linthicum v. Rudi, 122 Nev. 1452, 1455 , 148 P.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.