Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 166 - SPENDTHRIFT TRUSTS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 166.090 (2026)

Provision for support

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 166.090  Provision for support.

      1.  Provision for the beneficiary will be for the support, education, maintenance and benefit of the beneficiary alone, and without reference to or limitation by the beneficiary’s needs, station in life, or mode of life, or the needs of any other person, whether dependent upon the beneficiary or not.

      2.  The existence of a spendthrift trust does not depend on the character, capacity, incapacity, competency or incompetency of the beneficiary.

      [Part 5:86:1939; 1931 NCL § 6880.04]

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1971–2017 · leading case: In Re Shuman, 68 B.R. 290 (Bankr. D. Nev. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Shuman, 68 B.R. 290 (Bankr. D. Nev. 1986). · cites it 2× “050, but the following requirements must be met: (1) the beneficiary or beneficiaries must be named or clearly referred to in the writing, Nev.”
Ambrose v. First Nat'l Bank of Nevada, 482 P.2d 828 (Nev. 1971). · cites it 2× “For example, NRS 166.090 provides that "provision for the beneficiary will be for the support, education, maintenance and benefit of the beneficiary alone * * *.”
Klabacka Vs. Nelson c/w 66772, 2017 NV 24 (Nev. 2017). · cites it 2× “" NRS 166.090(1) (emphasis added). The legislative history of SSSTs in Nevada supports this conclusion.”
Klabacka Vs. Nelson c/w 66772, 2017 NV 24 (Nev. 2017). “" NRS 166.090(1) (emphasis added). The legislative history of SSSTs in Nevada supports this conclusion.”
Klabacka Vs. Nelson c/w 66772, 2017 NV 24 (Nev. 2017). “" NRS 166.090(1) (emphasis added). The legislative history of SSSTs in Nevada supports this conclusion.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 166.090(1) — 3 cases
Klabacka Vs. Nelson c/w 66772, 2017 NV 24 (Nev. 2017). “" NRS 166.090(1) (emphasis added). The legislative history of SSSTs in Nevada supports this conclusion.”
Klabacka Vs. Nelson c/w 66772, 2017 NV 24 (Nev. 2017). “" NRS 166.090(1) (emphasis added). The legislative history of SSSTs in Nevada supports this conclusion.”
Klabacka Vs. Nelson c/w 66772, 2017 NV 24 (Nev. 2017). “" NRS 166.090(1) (emphasis added). The legislative history of SSSTs in Nevada supports this conclusion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.