Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.395 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NRS 174.395 Short title. NRS 174.395 to 174.445, inclusive, may be cited as the Uniform Act To Secure the Attendance of Witnesses From Without a State in Criminal Proceedings.

(Added to NRS by 1967, 1421)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1970–2009 · leading case: Wyman v. State, 217 P.3d 572 (Nev. 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wyman v. State, 217 P.3d 572 (Nev. 2009). · cites it 3× “Second, we consider Wyman’s challenge to the district court’s denial of her request for a certificate of materiality to obtain the out-of-state mental health records of the State’s primary witness, under Nevada’s Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses From Without a…”

Wilson v. State, 114 P.3d 285 (Nev. 2005). “To ensure the attendance of out-of-state witnesses, the Legislature enacted NRS 174.395 to 174.445, known as the Uniform Act To Secure the Attendance of Witnesses From Without a State in Criminal Proceedings.”

Drummond v. State, 462 P.2d 1012 (Nev. 1970). “No pretrial effort was made by the State to compel his attendance [NRS 174.395 et seq. — Uniform Act to secure the attendance of out-of-state witnesses] although his out-of-state address and presence there were known at that time.”

Sheriff v. Smith, 609 P.2d 1236 (Nev. 1980). “In Ormound we held that “the procedures of the [Uniform Act To Secure the Attendance of Witnesses From Without a State in Criminal Proceedings, NRS 174.395 et seq.] must be utilized to support a finding that the prosecuting attorney has made a good faith effort to obtain the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.