Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 175 - TRIAL
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.441 (2026)

Jury may take written instructions, materials received in evidence, certain papers and own notes of trial on retiring for deliberation

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 175.441  Jury may take written instructions, materials received in evidence, certain papers and own notes of trial on retiring for deliberation.  Upon retiring for deliberation, the jury may take with them:

      1.  All papers and all other items and materials which have been received as evidence in the case, except depositions or copies of such public records or private documents given in evidence as ought not, in the opinion of the court, to be taken from the person having them in possession.

      2.  The written instructions given, and notes of the testimony or other proceedings on the trial, taken by themselves or any of them, but none taken by any other person.

      (Added to NRS by 1967, 1431)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1985–2006 · leading case: Estes v. State, 146 P.3d 1114 (Nev. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Estes v. State, 146 P.3d 1114 (Nev. 2006). “Further, NRS 175.441(1) provides that the jury, upon retiring for deliberation, may take with them all items introduced into evidence, “except depositions or copies of such public records or private documents given in evidence as ought not, in the opinion of the court, to be…”
Bailey v. State, 692 P.2d 1293 (Nev. 1985). “See NRS 175.441(1). The state essentially concedes that error occurred, but the state argues that the error was harmless.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.441(1): 2 cases
Estes v. State, 146 P.3d 1114 (Nev. 2006). “Further, NRS 175.441(1) provides that the jury, upon retiring for deliberation, may take with them all items introduced into evidence, “except depositions or copies of such public records or private documents given in evidence as ought not, in the opinion of the court, to be…”
Bailey v. State, 692 P.2d 1293 (Nev. 1985). “See NRS 175.441(1). The state essentially concedes that error occurred, but the state argues that the error was harmless.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.