Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 176A - PROBATION AND SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176A.250 (2026)

Establishment of program for treatment of mental illness or intellectual disabilities; assignment of defendant to program; progress reports

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 176A.250  Establishment of program for treatment of mental illness or intellectual disabilities; assignment of defendant to program; progress reports.  A district court, justice court or municipal court may establish an appropriate program for the treatment of mental illness or intellectual disabilities to which it may assign a defendant pursuant to NRS 174.032, 176.211, 176A.260 or 176A.400. The assignment must include the terms and conditions for successful completion of the program and provide for progress reports at intervals set by the court to ensure that the defendant is making satisfactory progress towards completion of the program.

      (Added to NRS by 2001 Special Session, 259; A 2003, 1946; 2013, 686; 2017, 3014; 2019, 4393; 2023, 1738)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2013–2019 · leading case: Hager v. State, 447 P.3d 1063 (Nev. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hager v. State, 447 P.3d 1063 (Nev. 2019). · cites it 8× “First, is a defendant who is assigned to and successfully completes a mental health specialty court diversion program under NRS 176A.250 through NRS 176A.265 (2013) thereby "adjudicated as mentally ill," making it illegal for him to possess a firearm under NRS 202.”
Hager (ian) v. State, 2019 NV 34 (Nev. 2019). · cites it 8× “In exchange for Hager's plea, the criminal case was suspended, the remaining charge was dismissed, and Hager was referred by Humboldt County to the mental health specialty court program that Washoe County established under NRS 176A.250 through NRS 176A.265. A licensed mental…”
McIntyre (Garrett) v. State, No. 61554 (Nev. Apr. 9, 2013). “See NRS 176A.250; NRS 176A.260(1); see also NRS 176A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.