Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 178 - GENERAL PROVISIONS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.4875 (2026)

Proceeding for forfeiture of bail pending review or appeal; proceeding for recommitment of defendant

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 178.4875  Proceeding for forfeiture of bail pending review or appeal; proceeding for recommitment of defendant.

      1.  If the court admits a petitioner to bail pending review of the petition or pending appeal, any subsequent proceeding for forfeiture of the bail must take place in the proceeding on the petition.

      2.  Any subsequent proceeding for the recommitment of the defendant pursuant to NRS 178.532 may be initiated on behalf of the State in the proceeding on the petition or in the district court where the original conviction was had, if it was in a different court. If the proceeding occurs in the district court where the original conviction was had, that court must notify the court conducting the proceeding on the petition of any order for recommitment entered and subsequently enforced.

      (Added to NRS by 1987, 1232)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2004–2004 · leading case: Bergna v. State, 102 P.3d 549 (Nev. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bergna v. State, 102 P.3d 549 (Nev. 2004). · cites it 2× “The language of NRS 178.4875(1), which specifies where subsequent proceedings for the forfeiture of any bail pending appeal or other review of a conviction must take place, also illustrates that the Legislature contemplated that an applicant could be granted release on bail…”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.4875(1): 1 case
Bergna v. State, 102 P.3d 549 (Nev. 2004). “The language of NRS 178.4875(1), which specifies where subsequent proceedings for the forfeiture of any bail pending appeal or other review of a conviction must take place, also illustrates that the Legislature contemplated that an applicant could be granted release on bail…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.