Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 179 - SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS OF A CRIMINAL NATURE; SEALING RECORDS OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS; REWARDS; FORMS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 179.177 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 179.177  Short title.  NRS 179.177 to 179.235, inclusive, may be cited as the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act.

      (Added to NRS by 1967, 1098)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2024 · leading case: Housewright v. Lefrak, 669 P.2d 711 (Nev. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Housewright v. Lefrak, 669 P.2d 711 (Nev. 1983). “All procedural safeguards provided by the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, NRS 179.177 et seq., are preserved to a prisoner subject to the Agreement, save those safeguards eliminated by the Agreement’s express terms.”
Starr v. State, 433 P.3d 301 (Nev. 2018). “Similarly, if a defendant remains at a crime scene but later flees the jurisdiction after being arrested and after criminal charges have been filed, he may also be subject to the court's contempt powers, forfeiture of bail (if any has been posted), and arrest pursuant to a…”
Starr (brandon) Vs. State, 2018 NV 90 (Nev. 2018). · cites it 2× “508(1)-(2); NRS 179.177- .235. In either situation, juries are permitted to rationally infer that people wholly innocent of any crime are unlikely to flee unless motivated by some measure of consciousness of guilt.”
Starr v. State (Nev. 2018). · cites it 2× “508(1)-(2); NRS 179.177- .235. In either situation, juries are permitted to rationally infer that people wholly innocent of any crime are unlikely to flee unless motivated by some measure of consciousness of guilt.”
Dir., Nevada Dep't of Prisons v. Blum, 639 P.2d 559 (Nev. 1982). “433 (1981), the Supreme Court held that the Agreement on Detainers preserves to a prisoner the procedural safeguards granted by the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, NRS 179.177 et seq., except those expressly withheld by the Agreement on Detainers itself.”
Starr (brandon) Vs. State, 2018 NV 90 (Nev. 2018). “508(1)-(2); NRS 179.177- .235. In either situation, juries are permitted to rationally infer that people wholly innocent of any crime are unlikely to flee unless motivated by some measure of consciousness of guilt.”
Velasco v. Balaam (D. Nev. 2024). “The Agreement on Detainers preserves to a prisoner the procedural safeguards 7 granted by the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, NRS 179.177 et seq., except those expressly 8 withheld by the Agreement on Detainers itself.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.