Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 189.060 (2026)
Grounds for dismissal of appeal; enforcement of judgment
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 189.060 Grounds for dismissal of appeal; enforcement of judgment.
1. The appeal may be dismissed on either of the following grounds:
(a) For failure to take the same in time.
(b) For failure to appear in the district court when required.
2. If the appeal is dismissed, a copy of the order of dismissal must be remitted to the justice, who may proceed to enforce the judgment.
[Part 1911 Cr. Prac. § 666; RL § 7516; NCL § 11313]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2015–2016 · leading case: Sparks (lawrence) Vs. Bare, 2016 NV 43 (Nev. 2016).
Sparks (lawrence) Vs. Bare, 2016 NV 43 (Nev. 2016). “NRS 189.060(1)(a), (b) (providing that a misdemeanor appeal may be dismissed for "failure to take the same in time" and for "failure to appear in the district court when required"); NRS 189.”
Solano (Roberto) v. Dist. Ct. (The City of Las Vegas) (Nev. 2016). “015(1); NRS 189.060; NRS 189.065; State v. Eighth Judicial Dist.”
Sparks (lawrence) Vs. Bare, 2016 NV 43 (Nev. 2016). “NRS 189.060(1)(a), (b) (providing that a misdemeanor appeal may be dismissed for "failure to take the same in time" and for "failure to appear in the district court when required"); NRS 189.”
Ediga (Michael) v. Dist. Ct. (The City of Las Vegas) (Nev. 2015). “015(1); NRS 189.060; NRS 189.065; therefore, a writ of prohibition is inappropriate.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 189.060(1)(a) — 2 cases
Sparks (lawrence) Vs. Bare, 2016 NV 43 (Nev. 2016). “NRS 189.060(1)(a), (b) (providing that a misdemeanor appeal may be dismissed for "failure to take the same in time" and for "failure to appear in the district court when required"); NRS 189.”
Sparks (lawrence) Vs. Bare, 2016 NV 43 (Nev. 2016). “NRS 189.060(1)(a), (b) (providing that a misdemeanor appeal may be dismissed for "failure to take the same in time" and for "failure to appear in the district court when required"); NRS 189.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.