Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 205.251 (2026)

Determination of value of property involved in larceny offense

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 205.251  Determination of value of property involved in larceny offense.  For the purposes of NRS 205.2175 to 205.2705, inclusive:

      1.  The value of property involved in a larceny offense shall be deemed to be the highest value attributable to the property by any reasonable standard.

      2.  The value of property involved in larceny offenses committed by one or more persons pursuant to a scheme or continuing course of conduct may be aggregated in determining the grade of the larceny offenses.

      (Added to NRS by 1997, 340; A 2009, 1243; 2019, 4431)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2011–2013 · leading case: Stephans v. State, 262 P.3d 727 (Nev. 2011).
Stephans v. State, 262 P.3d 727 (Nev. 2011). · cites it 2× “1(2)(c) of the Model Penal Code, NRS 205.251(1) provides: “The value of property involved in a larceny offense shall be deemed to be the highest value attributable to the property by any reasonable standard.”
Lopez (Preston) v. State, No. 61112 (Nev. Apr. 19, 2013). “220(1)(a) (1997); 1 see also NRS 205.251. It is for the jury to determine the weight and credibility to give conflicting testimony, and the jury's verdict will not be disturbed on appeal where, as here, substantial evidence supports the verdict.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 205.251(1): 1 case
Stephans v. State, 262 P.3d 727 (Nev. 2011). “1(2)(c) of the Model Penal Code, NRS 205.251(1) provides: “The value of property involved in a larceny offense shall be deemed to be the highest value attributable to the property by any reasonable standard.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 205.251(2): 1 case
Stephans v. State, 262 P.3d 727 (Nev. 2011). “1(2)(c) of the Model Penal Code, NRS 205.251(1) provides: “The value of property involved in a larceny offense shall be deemed to be the highest value attributable to the property by any reasonable standard.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.