Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 211A.127 (2026)

Violation of condition of suspended sentence by probationer or pretrial or presentence release by supervised releasee

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 211A.127  Violation of condition of suspended sentence by probationer or pretrial or presentence release by supervised releasee.

      1.  If a probationer has violated a condition of his or her suspended sentence, the court may, upon its own motion or upon the report and recommendation of the chief or an assistant, do any or all of the following:

      (a) Modify the conditions of the suspension of the sentence.

      (b) Modify and extend the suspension of the sentence, in whole or in part, for a period of not more than 1 year after the date on which the court finds that the probationer has committed the violation, unless a longer period is authorized by specific statute.

      (c) Revoke the suspension of the sentence, in whole or in part, and cause all or part of the sentence to be executed.

      2.  If a supervised releasee has violated a condition of his or her pretrial or presentence release, the court may, upon its own motion or upon the report and recommendation of the chief or an assistant, do any or all of the following:

      (a) Modify the conditions of his or her pretrial or presentence release.

      (b) Revoke his or her pretrial or presentencing release.

      (c) Consider the violation at the time of sentencing.

      3.  Before taking any action described in subsection 1 or 2, the court shall provide the probationer or the supervised releasee with notice of the proposed action and an opportunity to be heard.

      (Added to NRS by 1999, 1381; A 2013, 492)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2002–2002 · leading case: United States v. Miguel Angel Arellano-Torres, 303 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Miguel Angel Arellano-Torres, 303 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir. 2002). “NRS 211A.127, 176A.630; see also Lewis v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.