Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 277.190 (2026)
Enactment of Tahoe Regional Planning Compact
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 277.190 Enactment of Tahoe Regional Planning Compact. The Tahoe Regional Planning Compact, set forth
in full in NRS 277.200, is hereby
enacted into law.
(Added to NRS by 1968, 4; A 2013, 2366, 2367, 3838)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1975–1998 · leading case: Tahoe-Sierra Pres. Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg'l Plan. Agency, 638 F. Supp. 126 (D. Nev. 1986).
Tahoe-Sierra Pres. Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg'l Plan. Agency, 638 F. Supp. 126 (D. Nev. 1986). “Code Sections 66800 and 66801; NRS §§ 277.190 and 277.200. Nevada and California extensively amended in the Compact in 1980 in recognition that “[t]he waters of Lake Tahoe and other resources of the region are threatened with deterioration or degeneration, which endangers the…”
Tahoe Sierra Pres. Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg'l Plan. Agency, 808 F. Supp. 1474 (D. Nev. 1992). “A 60-day statute of limitation is imposed by the Compact for any legal action arising out of any ordinance of the agency.”
Jacobson v. Tahoe Reg'l Plan. Agency, 566 F.2d 1353 (9th Cir. 1977). “1974); Nev.Rev.Stat. § 277.190 et seq. (1973). Congress consented to the Tahoe Regional Planning Compact (hereinafter “the Compact”) in December 1969.”
California Tahoe Reg'l Plan. Agency v. Sahara Tahoe Corp., 504 F. Supp. 753 (D. Nev. 1981). “1 NRS 277.190, et seq., and Calif. Gov. Code § 66800, et seq.”
Lake Tahoe Watercraft v. Tahoe Reg'l Plan., 24 F. Supp. 2d 1062 (E.D. Cal. 1998). “3 Tahoe Regional Planning Compact, Pub.L. No. 91-148, 82 Stat. 360 (1969). In 1980, California and Nevada extensively amended the Compact to impose numerous specific mandates on TRPA.”
Tahoe Sierra Pres. Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg'l Plan. Agency, 808 F. Supp. 1484 (D. Nev. 1992). “§ 277.190 & § 277.200 Art. VI(j)(4)). 11 The TRPA took final action to enact the ordinance alleged to constitute a facial taking on June 25, 1981.”
Nw. Nat'l Life Ins. v. Jordan, 447 F. Supp. 856 (D. Nev. 1978). “§ 277.190 et seq., Cal. Gov’t. Code § 66800 et seq.”
W. Int'l Hotels v. Tahoe Reg'l Plan. Agency, 387 F. Supp. 429 (D. Nev. 1975). “Accordingly, It hereby is ordered that the motions to dismiss of Kingsbury General Improvement District, of Washoe and Douglas Counties, and of the State of Nevada are granted, and that the motion to dismiss of Tahoe Regional Planning Agency is granted with leave to amend within…”
California Tahoe Reg'l Plan. Agency v. Harrah's Corp., 509 F. Supp. 753 (D. Nev. 1981). “1 NRS 277.190, et seq., and Calif.Gov. Code § 66800, et seq.”
State ex rel. List v. Cnty. of Douglas, 546 P.2d 235 (Nev. 1976). “200; (2) the Agency is wrongfully paying funds into the State Retirement System; and, (3) the Tahoe Regional Planning Compact (NRS 277.190 et seq.) is in contravention of both the Federal and State Constitutions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.