Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 278 - PLANNING AND ZONING
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 278.390 (2026)

Title to dedicated property passes when final map recorded; offer of dedication may remain open

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 278.390  Title to dedicated property passes when final map recorded; offer of dedication may remain open.  Title to property dedicated or accepted for streets and easements passes when the final map is recorded. If at the time the final map is approved any streets are rejected, the offer of dedication shall be deemed to remain open and the governing body or planning commission may by resolution at any later date, and without further action by the subdivider, rescind its action and accept and open the streets for public use. Such an acceptance must be recorded in the office of the county recorder and be so noted by the recorder on the subdivision plat, if the county recorder does not maintain a cumulative index for such plats and amendments. If such an index is maintained, the county recorder shall direct an appropriate entry for the acceptance or amendment.

      [25:110:1941; 1931 NCL § 5063.24]—(NRS A 1977, 1501; 1987, 379, 662, 664; 1997, 2427)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2019–2019 · leading case: Schiller v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins. Co. C/W 74853, No. 72906 (Nev. July 15, 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Schiller v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins. Co. C/W 74853, No. 72906 (Nev. July 15, 2019). “"); see also NRS 278.390 (Title to property dedicated or accepted for streets and easements passes when the final map is recorded.”
Schiller v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins. Co. C/W 74853, No. 72906 (Nev. July 15, 2019). “"); see also NRS 278.390 (Title to property dedicated or accepted for streets and easements passes when the final map is recorded.”
Schiller v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins. Co., 444 P.3d 459 (Nev. 2019). “Schiller's reliance on policy exceptions to create an ambiguity as to the policy's coverage is unconvincing and unreasonable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.