NRS
293.197 Each department of district court constitutes separate office
for nomination and election; ballots used in certain counties.
1. In any judicial district that has more
than one district judge, each department is a separate office for the purposes
of nominating and electing the district judge of that department.
2. In any judicial district that includes
a county whose population is 100,000 or more:
(a) The departments of the family division of the
district court must be denoted as such on all ballots and sample ballots, using
the words “district court judge, family division, department . . .” Each such
department must be separately designated.
(b) The remaining departments of the district
court must be denoted as such on all ballots and sample ballots, using the
words “district court judge, department . . .” Each such department must be
designated with a numeral, beginning with “1” and continuing in sequence for
each department.
(Added to NRS by 1960,
245; A 1991,
2185; 1999,
3551)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 2009–2011 · leading case:
Landreth v. Malik, 251 P.3d 163 (Nev. 2011).
Landreth v. Malik, 251 P.3d 163 (Nev. 2011).
· cites it 2× “NRS 293.197(2)(a) requires election ballots for judges in the family division to use the words: "district court judge, family division, department," see 1991 Nev.”
Landreth v. Malik, 221 P.3d 1265 (Nev. 2009).
“NRS 293.197(2)(a) requires election ballots for judges in the family division to use the words: "district court judge, family division, department .”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 293.197(2)(a) — 2 cases
Landreth v. Malik, 251 P.3d 163 (Nev. 2011).
“NRS 293.197(2)(a) requires election ballots for judges in the family division to use the words: "district court judge, family division, department," see 1991 Nev.”
Landreth v. Malik, 221 P.3d 1265 (Nev. 2009).
“NRS 293.197(2)(a) requires election ballots for judges in the family division to use the words: "district court judge, family division, department .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.