Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 293 - ELECTIONS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 293.805 (2026)

Unlawful to pay compensation based upon total number of persons preregistered or registered or total number preregistered or registered in particular political party

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 293.805  Unlawful to pay compensation based upon total number of persons preregistered or registered or total number preregistered or registered in particular political party.

      1.  It is unlawful for a person to provide compensation for preregistering or registering voters that is based upon:

      (a) The total number of persons or voters a person preregisters or registers; or

      (b) The total number of persons or voters a person preregisters or registers in a particular political party.

      2.  A person who violates any provision of this section is guilty of a category E felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 193.130.

      (Added to NRS by 1993, 2167; A 1995, 1270; 1997, 235; 2017, 3869)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Busefink v. State, 286 P.3d 599 (Nev. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Busefink v. State, 286 P.3d 599 (Nev. 2012). · cites it 60× “: In this appeal, we consider whether NRS 293.805’s prohibition against providing compensation to voter registration canvassers based upon the total number of voters a canvasser registers violates the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and/or is unconstitutionally…”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 293.805(1): 1 case
Busefink v. State, 286 P.3d 599 (Nev. 2012). “: In this appeal, we consider whether NRS 293.805’s prohibition against providing compensation to voter registration canvassers based upon the total number of voters a canvasser registers violates the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and/or is unconstitutionally…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.