Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 3 - DISTRICT COURTS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 3.028 (2026)

Courses of instruction: Required attendance at course designed for training new judges of juvenile courts and family courts; payment of costs

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 3.028  Courses of instruction: Required attendance at course designed for training new judges of juvenile courts and family courts; payment of costs.

      1.  Unless the judge has previously attended such a course, each judge of the family court who is first elected or appointed on or after October 1, 1995, shall attend instruction at the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges in Reno, Nevada, in a course designed for the training of new judges of juvenile courts and family courts, within 12 months after taking office.

      2.  Unless the judge has previously attended such a course, each district judge who is first elected or appointed on or after October 1, 1995, in a judicial district that does not include a county whose population is 100,000 or more, shall attend instruction at the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges in Reno, Nevada, in a course designed for the training of new judges of juvenile courts and family courts, within 24 months after taking office.

      3.  The cost of the instruction must be paid from the Account for Continuing Judicial Education.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 2175; A 1995, 1494)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2009–2011 · leading case: Landreth v. Malik, 251 P.3d 163 (Nev. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Landreth v. Malik, 251 P.3d 163 (Nev. 2011). · cites it 6× “" [5] NRS 3.028(1). Thus, the Legislature's purpose is also clear when it limits assignment to hear family court matters to those judges who have obtained the necessary instruction.”
Landreth v. Malik, 221 P.3d 1265 (Nev. 2009). · cites it 3× “" [2] NRS 3.028(1). Thus, the Legislature's purpose is also clear when it limits assignment to hear family court matters to those judges who have obtained the necessary instruction.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 3.028(1): 2 cases
Landreth v. Malik, 251 P.3d 163 (Nev. 2011). “" [5] NRS 3.028(1). Thus, the Legislature's purpose is also clear when it limits assignment to hear family court matters to those judges who have obtained the necessary instruction.”
Landreth v. Malik, 221 P.3d 1265 (Nev. 2009). “" [2] NRS 3.028(1). Thus, the Legislature's purpose is also clear when it limits assignment to hear family court matters to those judges who have obtained the necessary instruction.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 3.028(2): 2 cases
Landreth v. Malik, 251 P.3d 163 (Nev. 2011). “" [5] NRS 3.028(1). Thus, the Legislature's purpose is also clear when it limits assignment to hear family court matters to those judges who have obtained the necessary instruction.”
Landreth v. Malik, 221 P.3d 1265 (Nev. 2009). “" [2] NRS 3.028(1). Thus, the Legislature's purpose is also clear when it limits assignment to hear family court matters to those judges who have obtained the necessary instruction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.