Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 306 - RECALL OF PUBLIC OFFICERS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 306.030 (2026)

Petition may consist of number of copies; each page must meet certain requirements; each copy must be verified by circulator

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 306.030  Petition may consist of number of copies; each page must meet certain requirements; each copy must be verified by circulator.

      1.  The petition may consist of any number of copies which are identical in form with the original, except for the name of the county and the signatures and addresses of the residences of the signers. The pages of the petition with the signatures and of any copy must be consecutively numbered. Each page must bear the name of a county, and only registered voters of that county may sign the page.

      2.  Every copy must be verified by the circulator thereof, who shall swear or affirm, before a person authorized by law to administer oaths, that the statements and signatures contained in the petition are true to the best of the circulator’s knowledge and belief. The verification must also contain a statement of the number of signatures being verified by the circulator.

      (Added to NRS by 1960, 282; A 1963, 1386; 1975, 1167; 1985, 1219; 1987, 1375; 1993, 2408; 2003, 1713)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1962–1965 · leading case: Fiannaca v. Gill, 372 P.2d 683 (Nev. 1962).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fiannaca v. Gill, 372 P.2d 683 (Nev. 1962). · cites it 3× “The petition shall also contain the residence addresses of the signers * * NRS 306.030 provides: *341 “The petition shall consist of any number of copies thereof, identical in form with the original, except for the signatures and residence addresses of the signers.”
Batchelor v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 408 P.2d 239 (Nev. 1965). “NRS 306.030. Complying with the mandate of NRS 306.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.