NRS
32.010 Cases in which receiver may be appointed. A receiver may be appointed by the court in
which an action is pending, or by the judge thereof:
1. In an action by a vendor to vacate a
fraudulent purchase of property, or by a creditor to subject any property or
fund to the creditor’s claim, or between partners or others jointly owning or
interested in any property or fund, on application of the plaintiff, or of any
party whose right to or interest in the property or fund, or the proceeds
thereof, is probable, and where it is shown that the property or fund is in
danger of being lost, removed or materially injured.
2. In an action by a mortgagee for the
foreclosure of the mortgage and sale of the mortgaged property, where it
appears that the mortgaged property is in danger of being lost, removed or
materially injured, or that the condition of the mortgage has not been
performed, and that the property is probably insufficient to discharge the
mortgage debt.
3. In an action to have a residential
multifamily rental property declared to be a substandard property that is
brought pursuant to NRS 244.36905 or 268.4284 to manage the repair or
rehabilitation of the substandard property.
4. After judgment, to carry the judgment
into effect.
5. After judgment, to dispose of the
property according to the judgment, or to preserve it during the pendency of an
appeal, or in proceedings in aid of execution, when an execution has been
returned unsatisfied, or when the judgment debtor refuses to apply the judgment
debtor’s property in satisfaction of the judgment.
6. In the cases when a corporation has
been dissolved, or is insolvent, or in imminent danger of insolvency, or has
forfeited its corporate rights.
7. In all other cases where receivers have
heretofore been appointed by the usages of the courts of equity.
[1911 CPA § 251; RL § 5193; NCL § 8749]—(NRS A 2025,
1463)
Notes of Decisions
Charmicor, Inc. v. Bradshaw Fin. Co., 550 P.2d 413 (Nev. 1976).
“) At the time appellant moved for the appointment of a receiver, all legal interest of appellant in the property had been terminated by the trustee’s sale. The only interest which remained vested in the appellant was a very contingent equitable interest which hinged on the…”
Tousa Homes, Inc. v. Phillips, 363 F. Supp. 2d 1274 (D. Nev. 2005).
· cites it 5× “In its Motion to Dismiss, PlaintiffiCounterdefendant asserts that Defendants/Counterclaim-ants have failed to meet the requirements of NRS 32.010 and that there are adequate remedies at law, specifically: that Defendants/Counterclaimants have failed to allege that…”
Kraemer v. Kraemer, 382 P.2d 394 (Nev. 1963).
“There can be no question about the court’s power to appoint a receiver under such circumstances, NRS 32.010(6); 95 A.L.R. 902 ; nor was the security requirement unreasonable.”
N5Hyg, Llc v. Iglesias (Nev. 2022).
· cites it 8× “Second, appellant in that case sought a receiver under NRS 32.010 as a means to facilitate the final relief sought, i.”
U.S. Bank Nat'l Assoc. Vs. Palmilla Dev. Co., 2015 NV 9 (Nev. 2015).
· cites it 6× “But the transaction that we presently consider was orchestrated pursuant to the method of judicial foreclosure sanctioned by NRS 32.010, not NRS 107.080. When a sale is conducted pursuant to NRS 107.”
Benford, Iii Vs. Jones-Benford (Nev. 2019).
· cites it 2× “" NRS 32.010(1); see also NRS 32.010(6) (a court may appoint a receiver "[i]n all other cases where receivers have heretofore been appointed by the usages of the courts of equity"); NRS 125.”
Surefunding, Llc v. Hatton (Nev. 2022).
· cites it 2× “Because respondents do not have standing to bring their substantive tort law claim, they are therefore barred from seeking the appointment of a receiver; NRS 32.010 only permits a district court to appoint a receiver where "an action is pending.”
Stapleton v. Balding (D. Nev. 2020).
· cites it 2× “Applicable law 9 Plaintiffs offer several sources of authority in support of their motion: (1) NRS 32.010; 10 (2) 28 U.S.C. § 3103 ; and (3) Local Rule 66-1 and Rule 66 of the Federal Rules of Civil 11 Procedure.”
U.S. Bank Nat'l Assoc. Vs. Palmilla Dev. Co., 2015 NV 9 (Nev. 2015).
· cites it 3× “But the transaction that we presently consider was orchestrated pursuant to the method of judicial foreclosure sanctioned by NRS 32.010, not NRS 107.080. When a sale is conducted pursuant to NRS 107.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 32.010(1) — 3 cases
N5Hyg, Llc v. Iglesias (Nev. 2022).
“Second, appellant in that case sought a receiver under NRS 32.010 as a means to facilitate the final relief sought, i.”
Benford, Iii Vs. Jones-Benford (Nev. 2019).
“" NRS 32.010(1); see also NRS 32.010(6) (a court may appoint a receiver "[i]n all other cases where receivers have heretofore been appointed by the usages of the courts of equity"); NRS 125.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 32.010(2) — 2 cases
U.S. Bank Nat'l Assoc. Vs. Palmilla Dev. Co., 2015 NV 9 (Nev. 2015).
“But the transaction that we presently consider was orchestrated pursuant to the method of judicial foreclosure sanctioned by NRS 32.010, not NRS 107.080. When a sale is conducted pursuant to NRS 107.”
U.S. Bank Nat'l Assoc. Vs. Palmilla Dev. Co., 2015 NV 9 (Nev. 2015).
“But the transaction that we presently consider was orchestrated pursuant to the method of judicial foreclosure sanctioned by NRS 32.010, not NRS 107.080. When a sale is conducted pursuant to NRS 107.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 32.010(6) — 2 cases
Kraemer v. Kraemer, 382 P.2d 394 (Nev. 1963).
“There can be no question about the court’s power to appoint a receiver under such circumstances, NRS 32.010(6); 95 A.L.R. 902 ; nor was the security requirement unreasonable.”
Benford, Iii Vs. Jones-Benford (Nev. 2019).
“" NRS 32.010(1); see also NRS 32.010(6) (a court may appoint a receiver "[i]n all other cases where receivers have heretofore been appointed by the usages of the courts of equity"); NRS 125.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.