Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 40 - ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS IN PARTICULAR CASES CONCERNING PROPERTY
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 40.250 (2026)

Unlawful detainer: Possession after expiration of term

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 40.250  Unlawful detainer: Possession after expiration of term.  A tenant of real property or a mobile home for a term less than life is guilty of an unlawful detainer when the tenant continues in possession, in person or by subtenant, of the property or mobile home or any part thereof, after the expiration of the term for which it is let to the tenant. In all cases where real property is leased for a specified term or period, or by express or implied contract, whether written or parol, the tenancy terminates without notice at the expiration of the specified term or period.

      [1911 CPA § 646; A 1917, 31; 1919 RL § 5588; NCL § 9135]—(NRS A 1969, 262, 574; 1973, 1084; 1977, 1344; 1979, 1877; 1985, 227)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1967–1992 · leading case: Gasser v. Jet Craft Ltd., 487 P.2d 346 (Nev. 1971).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gasser v. Jet Craft Ltd., 487 P.2d 346 (Nev. 1971). · cites it 13× “Respondent not only contended that no actionable breach had occurred, and that forfeiture would in any event be inequitable, but that appellant’s purported “notice to quit” did not satisfy NRS 40.250. Having prevailed upon the merits, respondent has not pressed the latter…”
Adams v. Joseph F. Sanson Inv. Co., 376 F. Supp. 61 (D. Nev. 1974). · cites it 3× “) Under Nevada’s unlawful detainer statues, if a tenant is allegedly guilty of unlawful detainer because he is in default in rent after notice to pay or *67 surrender (NRS § 40.250, subd. 1(c)), the tenant is entitled to at least a hearing before restitution of possession to the…”
Volpert v. Papagna, 433 P.2d 533 (Nev. 1967). · cites it 3× “Notice to pay or quit: Notice was given pursuant to NRS 40.250(3) which reads in relevant part: “When he continues in possession * * * after default in the payment of any rent and after a notice in writing, requiring in the alternative the payment of the rent or the surrender of…”
Davidsohn v. Doyle, 825 P.2d 1227 (Nev. 1992). “2516, in pertinent part, is set forth below: A tenant of real property or a mobile home for a term less than life is guilty of an unlawful detainer when he continues in possession, in person or by subtenant, after a neglect or failure to perform any condition or covenant of the…”
Aikins v. Andrews, 542 P.2d 734 (Nev. 1975). · cites it 3× “NRS 40.250(1) (e) provides that “A tenant of real property .”
Am. Fence, Inc. v. Wham, 603 P.2d 274 (Nev. 1979). “180 (1915); NRS 40.250, and compliance with the requirements of the statute is necessary to the maintenance of the action.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 40.250(1): 1 case
Aikins v. Andrews, 542 P.2d 734 (Nev. 1975). “NRS 40.250(1) (e) provides that “A tenant of real property .”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 40.250(1)(e): 1 case
Aikins v. Andrews, 542 P.2d 734 (Nev. 1975). “NRS 40.250(1) (e) provides that “A tenant of real property .”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 40.250(3): 2 cases
Gasser v. Jet Craft Ltd., 487 P.2d 346 (Nev. 1971). “Respondent not only contended that no actionable breach had occurred, and that forfeiture would in any event be inequitable, but that appellant’s purported “notice to quit” did not satisfy NRS 40.250. Having prevailed upon the merits, respondent has not pressed the latter…”
Volpert v. Papagna, 433 P.2d 533 (Nev. 1967). “Notice to pay or quit: Notice was given pursuant to NRS 40.250(3) which reads in relevant part: “When he continues in possession * * * after default in the payment of any rent and after a notice in writing, requiring in the alternative the payment of the rent or the surrender of…”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 40.250(4): 2 cases
Gasser v. Jet Craft Ltd., 487 P.2d 346 (Nev. 1971). “Respondent not only contended that no actionable breach had occurred, and that forfeiture would in any event be inequitable, but that appellant’s purported “notice to quit” did not satisfy NRS 40.250. Having prevailed upon the merits, respondent has not pressed the latter…”
Volpert v. Papagna, 433 P.2d 533 (Nev. 1967). “Notice to pay or quit: Notice was given pursuant to NRS 40.250(3) which reads in relevant part: “When he continues in possession * * * after default in the payment of any rent and after a notice in writing, requiring in the alternative the payment of the rent or the surrender of…”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 40.250(5): 1 case
Gasser v. Jet Craft Ltd., 487 P.2d 346 (Nev. 1971). “Respondent not only contended that no actionable breach had occurred, and that forfeiture would in any event be inequitable, but that appellant’s purported “notice to quit” did not satisfy NRS 40.250. Having prevailed upon the merits, respondent has not pressed the latter…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.