Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 41.336 (2026)

Special damages; notice and demand for correction

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 41.336  Special damages; notice and demand for correction.

      1.  In any action for damages for the publication of a libel in a newspaper, or of a slander by radio or television broadcast, the plaintiff may recover no more than special damages unless a correction is demanded by the plaintiff and not published or broadcast.

      2.  A demand for correction shall be in writing and shall be served upon the newspaper or broadcaster at its place of business. Such demand shall specify the statements claimed to be libelous or slanderous and shall demand a correction.

      3.  Such demand for correction must be served within 90 days after the plaintiff has knowledge of the publication or broadcast of the statements claimed to be libelous or slanderous.

      (Added to NRS by 1969, 553; A 1975, 1521)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1985–2017 · leading case: Rose v. Dowd, 265 F. Supp. 3d 525 (E.D. Pa. 2017).
Rose v. Dowd, 265 F. Supp. 3d 525 (E.D. Pa. 2017). · cites it 4× “) Specifically, Dowd contends that Nevada’s statute "Libel in Newspaper, Slander by Radio or Television Broadcast,” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 41.336 , ("Retraction- Demand Statute”) applies to Rose's defamation claims.”
Laxalt v. McClatchy, 622 F. Supp. 737 (D. Nev. 1985). · cites it 2× “NRS § 41.336. Only if the plaintiff makes such a demand, and the defendant refuses to publish the retraction may the plaintiff recover more than special damages.”
Adobe Sys. Inc. v. Christenson, 891 F. Supp. 2d 1194 (D. Nev. 2012). · cites it 4× “Instead, they contend Defendants’ suppliers stopped doing business with them because of the litigation, not because of any defamatory statements in the press release.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.