Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 463 - LICENSING AND CONTROL OF GAMING
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.343 (2026)

Declaratory judgment; limitations on injunctive relief

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 463.343  Declaratory judgment; limitations on injunctive relief.

      1.  The Board or Commission or any applicant, licensee, association of licensees, nonprofit corporation that represents licensees, person found suitable, holding company, intermediary company or publicly traded corporation which is registered with the Commission may obtain a judicial determination of any question of construction or validity arising under this chapter, chapter 462 of NRS or any regulation of the Commission by bringing an action for a declaratory judgment in the district court in and for Carson City or the district court in and for the county in which the plaintiff resides or does business, in accordance with the provisions of chapter 30 of NRS.

      2.  When an action is brought by a person other than the Board or Commission, the Commission must be made a party to the action and the Attorney General must be served with a copy of the complaint and is entitled to appear in the action.

      3.  Statutes and regulations reviewed pursuant to this section must be construed in a manner consistent with the declared policy of the State.

      4.  The filing of a complaint for judicial determination under this section does not stay enforcement of any Commission or Board action. The Board or Commission may grant a stay upon appropriate terms.

      5.  In any proceeding brought under this section, the district court shall not grant any injunctive relief or relief based upon any other extraordinary common-law writ to:

      (a) Any applicant for licensing, finding of suitability or registration;

      (b) Any person who has been ordered by the Board or Commission to submit his or her application for licensing, finding of suitability or registration;

      (c) Any person seeking judicial review of an action of the Commission which is subject to the provisions of NRS 463.315 to 463.318, inclusive; or

      (d) Any person who is adversely affected by the appointment of a supervisor pursuant to chapter 463B of NRS.

      (Added to NRS by 1977, 1417; A 1979, 787; 1981, 1087; 1983, 1567; 1991, 2267; 1993, 186; 2023, 1498)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1982–1997 · leading case: State v. Glusman, 651 P.2d 639 (Nev. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Glusman, 651 P.2d 639 (Nev. 1982). · cites it 5× “Appellants attempt to posture themselves outside the purview of NRS 463.343 (the declaratory judgments provision of the gaming chapter) by disclaiming the status of “applicant, licensee or person found suitable.”
Resnick v. Nevada Gaming Comm'n, 752 P.2d 229 (Nev. 1988). · cites it 2× “Resnick also asked the lower court, under NRS 463.343, 6 to interpret NRS 463.313(1) to allow pre-hearing discovery of investigative reports.”
Cohen v. State, 930 P.2d 125 (Nev. 1997). · cites it 2× “315 regarding review of disciplinary matters and NRS 463.343(1) regarding interpretation of statutes and regulations, but not under NRS 463.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.343(1) — 1 case
Cohen v. State, 930 P.2d 125 (Nev. 1997). “315 regarding review of disciplinary matters and NRS 463.343(1) regarding interpretation of statutes and regulations, but not under NRS 463.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.343(4) — 1 case
State v. Glusman, 651 P.2d 639 (Nev. 1982). “Appellants attempt to posture themselves outside the purview of NRS 463.343 (the declaratory judgments provision of the gaming chapter) by disclaiming the status of “applicant, licensee or person found suitable.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.343(5) — 1 case
Cohen v. State, 930 P.2d 125 (Nev. 1997). “315 regarding review of disciplinary matters and NRS 463.343(1) regarding interpretation of statutes and regulations, but not under NRS 463.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.343(5)(b) — 1 case
State v. Glusman, 651 P.2d 639 (Nev. 1982). “Appellants attempt to posture themselves outside the purview of NRS 463.343 (the declaratory judgments provision of the gaming chapter) by disclaiming the status of “applicant, licensee or person found suitable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.