Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 465.075 (2026)

Use or possession of device, software or hardware to obtain advantage at playing game prohibited

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 465.075  Use or possession of device, software or hardware to obtain advantage at playing game prohibited.  It is unlawful for any person to use, possess with the intent to use or assist another person in using or possessing with the intent to use any computerized, electronic, electrical or mechanical device, or any software or hardware, or any combination thereof, which is designed, constructed, altered or programmed to obtain an advantage at playing any game in a licensed gaming establishment or any game that is offered by a licensee or affiliate, including, without limitation, a device that:

      1.  Projects the outcome of the game;

      2.  Keeps track of cards played or cards prepared for play in the game;

      3.  Analyzes the probability of the occurrence of an event relating to the game; or

      4.  Analyzes the strategy for playing or betting to be used in the game,

Ê except as may be made available as part of an approved game or otherwise permitted by the Commission.

      (Added to NRS by 1985, 970; A 2011, 216; 2013, 1317)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1987–2020 · leading case: Taylor Vs. Colon, 482 P.3d 1212 (Nev. 2020).
Taylor Vs. Colon, 482 P.3d 1212 (Nev. 2020). · cites it 2× “First, we note that the "gist or sting" of the challenged portion of Taylor's presentation was undeniably that a player had been caught using a cheating device in violation of NRS 465.075(1). Taylor's presentation was entitled Scams, Cheats, and Blacklists.”
Sheriff, Clark Cnty., Nev. v. Anderson, 746 P.2d 643 (Nev. 1987). · cites it 4× “The court found that NRS 465.075 was unconstitutionally vague on its face and in its application; was overbroad; and that it denied Anderson his First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 465.075(1): 1 case
Taylor Vs. Colon, 482 P.3d 1212 (Nev. 2020). “First, we note that the "gist or sting" of the challenged portion of Taylor's presentation was undeniably that a player had been caught using a cheating device in violation of NRS 465.075(1). Taylor's presentation was entitled Scams, Cheats, and Blacklists.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.