Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 484D - EQUIPMENT, INSPECTIONS AND SIZE, WEIGHT AND LOAD OF VEHICLES
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 484D.435 (2026)

Windshield and windows must be unobstructed

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 484D.435  Windshield and windows must be unobstructed.

      1.  A person shall not drive any motor vehicle with any sign, poster or other nontransparent material upon the front windshield, side wings or side or rear windows of such vehicle which obstructs the driver’s clear view of the highway or any intersecting highway.

      2.  This section shall not apply to any sign, poster or other material displayed in the 6-inch square area of the lower corner of the windshield farthest removed from the driver or to any other material required to be displayed on a windshield or window by federal or state law.

      (Added to NRS by 1969, 1208)—(Substituted in revision for NRS 484.619)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2014–2015 · leading case: United States v. Sanders, 95 F. Supp. 3d 1274 (D. Nev. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Sanders, 95 F. Supp. 3d 1274 (D. Nev. 2015). · cites it 11× “The government opposes the motion arguing that prior to the stop, the officers observed two tree air fresheners hanging from the rearview mirror that were causing an obstructed view of the driver in violation of NRS 484D.435. The officers were also suspicious before the stop…”
United States v. $102,836.00 in United States Currency, 9 F. Supp. 3d 1152 (D. Nev. 2014). “IT IS SO ORDERED. . It is against Nevada law to drive a vehicle at a rate of speed greater than the posted speed limit (NRS 484B.”
State v. Cantsee, 2014 NV 24 (Nev. 2014). · cites it 22× “Deputy Wendy Jason, the investigating officer, testified that she stopped Cantsee because his cracked windshield violated NRS 484D.435. However, MRS 48411435 does not prohibit operating a vehicle with a cracked windshield.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 484D.435(1) — 2 cases
United States v. Sanders, 95 F. Supp. 3d 1274 (D. Nev. 2015). “The government opposes the motion arguing that prior to the stop, the officers observed two tree air fresheners hanging from the rearview mirror that were causing an obstructed view of the driver in violation of NRS 484D.435. The officers were also suspicious before the stop…”
State v. Cantsee, 2014 NV 24 (Nev. 2014). “Deputy Wendy Jason, the investigating officer, testified that she stopped Cantsee because his cracked windshield violated NRS 484D.435. However, MRS 48411435 does not prohibit operating a vehicle with a cracked windshield.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.