Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 573.037 (2026)

Deposit in lieu of bond: Amount; action for recovery against deposit; retention by Department

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 573.037  Deposit in lieu of bond: Amount; action for recovery against deposit; retention by Department.

      1.  As authorized by NRS 573.025 or subsection 2 of NRS 573.030, in lieu of filing the bond described in NRS 573.033, the applicant may deliver to the Director the receipt of a bank, credit union or trust company doing business in this state showing the deposit with that bank, credit union or trust company of cash or of securities endorsed in blank by the owner thereof and, except as otherwise provided in NRS 573.025, of a market value equal at least to the required principal amount of the bond, the cash or securities to be deposited in escrow under an agreement conditioned as in the case of a bond. A receipt must be accompanied by evidence that there are no unsatisfied judgments against the applicant of record in the county where the applicant resides.

      2.  An action for recovery against any such deposit may be brought in the same manner as in the case of an action for recovery on a bond filed under the provisions of this chapter.

      3.  Except as otherwise provided in NRS 573.025, if any licensed operator of a public livestock auction or holder of a limited license to conduct an annual sale of livestock for any reason ceases to operate the auction or sale, the amount of money or securities deposited in lieu of a bond must be retained by the Department for 1 year. If 1 year after the cessation of the operation, no legal action has been commenced to recover against the money or securities, the amount thereof must be delivered to the owner thereof. If a legal action has been commenced within that period, all such money and securities must be held by the Director subject to the order of a court of competent jurisdiction.

      (Added to NRS by 1965, 382; A 1993, 1751; 1999, 1514, 3691; 2001, 91; 2019, 1384, 2610)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2016–2016 · leading case: Castaneda (anthony) Vs. State, 2016 NV 44 (Nev. 2016).
Castaneda (anthony) Vs. State, 2016 NV 44 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 6× “The legislature has not made the number of children victimized the basis of separate units of prosecution in section 573.037.") (internal quotations and citations omitted).”
Castaneda (anthony) Vs. State, 2016 NV 44 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 2× “The legislature has not made the number of children victimized the basis of separate units of prosecution in section 573.037.") (internal quotations and citations omitted).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.