Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 585 - FOOD, DRUGS AND COSMETICS: ADULTERATION; LABELS; BRANDS

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 585.520

Prohibited acts

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 585.520  Prohibited acts.  [Replaced in revision by NRS 585.900.]

 

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of Pharmacy
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of Pharmacy (2008) nev · cites it 17× “§ 331 and are therefore persuasive authority concerning the interpretation of NRS 585.520, the controlling law in the instant case.”
Dutchess Bus. Servs. v. State, Bd. of Pharm. (2008) nev · cites it 16× “520(1) does not contain a knowledge requirement is further supported by the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of NRS 585.520( l )'s federal counterpart, section 331(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 585.520(1) — 2 cases
Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of Pharmacy (2008) nev “§ 331 and are therefore persuasive authority concerning the interpretation of NRS 585.520, the controlling law in the instant case.”
Dutchess Bus. Servs. v. State, Bd. of Pharm. (2008) nev “520(1) does not contain a knowledge requirement is further supported by the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of NRS 585.520( l )'s federal counterpart, section 331(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 585.520(l) — 1 case
Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of Pharmacy (2008) nev “§ 331 and are therefore persuasive authority concerning the interpretation of NRS 585.520, the controlling law in the instant case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.