Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 585.520 (2026)
Prohibited acts
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: Dutchess Bus. Servs., Inc. v. Nevada State Bd. of Pharmacy, 191 P.3d 1159 (Nev. 2008).
Dutchess Bus. Servs., Inc. v. Nevada State Bd. of Pharmacy, 191 P.3d 1159 (Nev. 2008). “§ 331 and are therefore persuasive authority concerning the interpretation of NRS 585.520, the controlling law in the instant case.”
Dutchess Bus. Servs. v. State, Bd. of Pharm., 184 P.3d 397 (Nev. 2008). “520(1) does not contain a knowledge requirement is further supported by the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of NRS 585.520( l )'s federal counterpart, section 331(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 585.520(1) — 2 cases
Dutchess Bus. Servs., Inc. v. Nevada State Bd. of Pharmacy, 191 P.3d 1159 (Nev. 2008). “§ 331 and are therefore persuasive authority concerning the interpretation of NRS 585.520, the controlling law in the instant case.”
Dutchess Bus. Servs. v. State, Bd. of Pharm., 184 P.3d 397 (Nev. 2008). “520(1) does not contain a knowledge requirement is further supported by the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of NRS 585.520( l )'s federal counterpart, section 331(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 585.520(l) — 1 case
Dutchess Bus. Servs., Inc. v. Nevada State Bd. of Pharmacy, 191 P.3d 1159 (Nev. 2008). “§ 331 and are therefore persuasive authority concerning the interpretation of NRS 585.520, the controlling law in the instant case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.