Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 600A - TRADE SECRETS (UNIFORM ACT)
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 600A.060 (2026)

Attorney’s fees

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 600A.060  Attorney’s fees.  If:

      1.  A claim of misappropriation is made in bad faith;

      2.  A motion to terminate an injunction is made or resisted in bad faith; or

      3.  Willful and malicious misappropriation exists,

Ê the court may award reasonable attorney’s fees to the prevailing party.

      (Added to NRS by 1987, 21)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2024 · leading case: Mei-Gsr Holdings, LLC v. Peppermill Casinos, Inc., 416 P.3d 249 (Nev. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mei-Gsr Holdings, LLC v. Peppermill Casinos, Inc., 416 P.3d 249 (Nev. 2018). · cites it 10× “Whether the district court erred in awarding Peppermill attorney fees under NRCP 68 GSR argues that the district court erroneously awarded Peppermill attorney fees under NRCP 68 because (1) NRS 600A.060 is the sole means of recovering attorney fees in *258 a case concerning…”
Frantz v. Johnson, 999 P.2d 351 (Nev. 2000). · cites it 6× “00 in attorney fees pursuant to NRS 600A.060 or NRS 18.010(2)(b), $15,779.”
Mei-gsr Holdings, LLC Vs. Peppermill Casinos, Inc., 2018 NV 31 (Nev. 2018). · cites it 14× “Whether the district court erred in awarding Peppermill attorney fees under NRCP 68 GSR argues that the district court erroneously awarded Peppermill attorney fees under NRCP 68 because (1) NRS 600A.060 is the sole means of recovering attorney fees in a case concerning…”
Mei-gsr Holdings, LLC Vs. Peppermill Casinos, Inc., 2018 NV 31 (Nev. 2018). · cites it 14× “Whether the district court erred in awarding Peppermill attorney fees under NRCP 68 GSR argues that the district court erroneously awarded Peppermill attorney fees under NRCP 68 because (1) NRS 600A.060 is the sole means of recovering attorney fees in a case concerning…”
Golden Rd. Motor Inn, Inc. Vs. Mei-gsr Holdings LLC c/w 64452/65497, 2016 NV 49 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 6× “As to Atlantis' claims against GSR, the district court found that GSR was not liable for tortious interference with contractual relations or misappropriation of trade secrets and awarded GSR attorney fees and costs based on its offer of judgment, but denied fees requested under…”
Golden Rd. Motor Inn v. Islam, 2016 NV 49 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 3× “As to Atlantis' claims against GSR, the district court found that GSR was not liable for tortious interference with contractual relations or misappropriation of trade secrets and awarded GSR attorney fees and costs based on its offer of judgment, but denied fees requested under…”
Golden Rd. Motor Inn, Inc. Vs. Mei-gsr Holdings LLC c/w 64452/65497, 2016 NV 49 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 3× “As to Atlantis' claims against GSR, the district court found that GSR was not liable for tortious interference with contractual relations or misappropriation of trade secrets and awarded GSR attorney fees and costs based on its offer of judgment, but denied fees requested under…”
Golden Rd. Motor Inn, Inc. Vs. Mei-gsr Holdings LLC c/w 64452/65497, 2016 NV 49 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 3× “As to Atlantis' claims against GSR, the district court found that GSR was not liable for tortious interference with contractual relations or misappropriation of trade secrets and awarded GSR attorney fees and costs based on its offer of judgment, but denied fees requested under…”
Golden Rd. Motor Inn, Inc. Vs. Mei-gsr Holdings LLC c/w 64452/65497, 2016 NV 49 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 3× “As to Atlantis' claims against GSR, the district court found that GSR was not liable for tortious interference with contractual relations or misappropriation of trade secrets and awarded GSR attorney fees and costs based on its offer of judgment, but denied fees requested under…”
Proficio Mortg. Ventures, LLC v. The Fed. Sav. Bank (D. Nev. 2024). · cites it 2× “NRS § 600A.060(3). It provides three separate definitions 19 for “misappropriation” with each definition indicating action by a “person.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 600A.060(3) — 2 cases
Frantz v. Johnson, 999 P.2d 351 (Nev. 2000). “00 in attorney fees pursuant to NRS 600A.060 or NRS 18.010(2)(b), $15,779.”
Proficio Mortg. Ventures, LLC v. The Fed. Sav. Bank (D. Nev. 2024). “NRS § 600A.060(3). It provides three separate definitions 19 for “misappropriation” with each definition indicating action by a “person.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.