NRS
608.115 Records of wages.
1. Every employer shall establish and
maintain records of wages for the benefit of his or her employees, showing for
each pay period the following information for each employee:
(a) Gross wage or salary other than compensation
in the form of:
(1) Services; or
(2) Food, housing or clothing.
(b) Deductions.
(c) Net cash wage or salary.
(d) Except as otherwise provided in NRS 608.215, total hours employed in the
pay period by noting the number of hours per day.
(e) Date of payment.
2. The information required by this
section must be furnished to each employee within 10 days after the employee
submits a request.
3. Records of wages must be maintained for
a 2-year period following the entry of information in the record.
(Added to NRS by 1975,
508; A 1979,
1488; 1983,
250; 1985,
579; 2017,
4179)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
8
cases (
5 in the last 5 years), 2016–2025 · leading case:
A Cab, LLC v. Murray, 2021 NV 84 (Nev. 2021).
A Cab, LLC v. Murray, 2021 NV 84 (Nev. 2021).
· cites it 28× “The district court held that the information A Cab provided to the drivers did not conform to the requirements of what records employers must keep and provide under NRS 608.115. We agree. The plain meaning of the statute requires employers to keep records showing an employees…”
Roces v. Reno Hous. Auth., 300 F. Supp. 3d 1172 (D. Nev. 2018).
“To support its position that this practice is permitted under Nevada law, RHA cites to NRS 608.115, which reads, in pertinent part: Records of wages.”
Martel v. HG Staffing, LLC, 2022 NV 56 (Nev. 2022).
· cites it 3× “A two-year limitations period creates consistent application of the law, chiefly because “NRS 608.115 requires employers to maintain an employee’s record of wages for [only] two years.”
Perry Vs. Terrible Herbst, Inc., 2016 NV 75 (Nev. 2016).
· cites it 2× “As an example, NRS 608.115 requires employers to maintain an employee's record of wages for two years.”
Nelson v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc. (D. Nev. 2022).
· cites it 2× “Moreover, NAC § 608.115 explicitly states that an 21 employer, like Defendant, must pay an employee for “all time worked by the employee 22 at the direction of the employer, including time worked by the employee that is outside 23 the scheduled hours of work of the…”
Perry Vs. Terrible Herbst, Inc., 2016 NV 75 (Nev. 2016).
“As an example, NRS 608.115 requires employers to maintain an employee's record of wages for two years.”
Martel v. HG Staffing, LLC, 2022 NV 56 (Nev. 2022).
“A two-year limitations period creates consistent application of the law, chiefly because “NRS 608.115 requires employers to maintain an employee’s record of wages for [only] two years.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 608.115(1): 2 cases
A Cab, LLC v. Murray, 2021 NV 84 (Nev. 2021).
“The district court held that the information A Cab provided to the drivers did not conform to the requirements of what records employers must keep and provide under NRS 608.115. We agree. The plain meaning of the statute requires employers to keep records showing an employees…”
Nelson v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc. (D. Nev. 2022).
“Moreover, NAC § 608.115 explicitly states that an 21 employer, like Defendant, must pay an employee for “all time worked by the employee 22 at the direction of the employer, including time worked by the employee that is outside 23 the scheduled hours of work of the…”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 608.115(1)(a): 1 case
A Cab, LLC v. Murray, 2021 NV 84 (Nev. 2021).
“The district court held that the information A Cab provided to the drivers did not conform to the requirements of what records employers must keep and provide under NRS 608.115. We agree. The plain meaning of the statute requires employers to keep records showing an employees…”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 608.115(2): 2 cases
A Cab, LLC v. Murray, 2021 NV 84 (Nev. 2021).
“The district court held that the information A Cab provided to the drivers did not conform to the requirements of what records employers must keep and provide under NRS 608.115. We agree. The plain meaning of the statute requires employers to keep records showing an employees…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.