NRS
612.515 Appeal to Board of Review.
1. An appeal to the Board of Review by any
party must be allowed as a matter of right if the Appeal Tribunal’s decision
reversed or modified the Administrator’s determination. In all other cases,
further review must be at the discretion of the Board of Review.
2. The Board of Review on its own motion
may initiate a review of a decision or determination of an Appeal Tribunal
within 11 days after the date of mailing or electronic transmission of the
decision.
3. The Board of Review may affirm, modify
or reverse the findings or conclusions of the Appeal Tribunal solely on the
basis of evidence previously submitted, or upon the basis of such additional
evidence as it may direct to be taken.
4. Each party, including the
Administrator, must be promptly furnished a copy of the decision and the
supporting findings of the Board of Review.
[6:129:1937; renumbered 6.13:129:1937 and A 1951,
348]—(NRS A 1971,
1162; 1975,
914; 1993,
1831; 2005,
448; 2021,
1481)
Notes of Decisions
Kraft v. Nevada Emp. Sec. Dep't, 717 P.2d 583 (Nev. 1986).
· cites it 2× “In so holding, we stated: Pursuant to NRS 612.515(3), the Board of Review is authorized to “affirm, modify or reverse” a decision of the appeals referee.”
McCracken v. Fancy, 639 P.2d 552 (Nev. 1982).
“See NRS 612.515(1). Fancy sought judicial review of the administrative decision against her.”
Jones v. Rosner, 719 P.2d 805 (Nev. 1986).
“The executive director of the Nevada Employment Security Department denied respondent benefits on the basis that she was terminated for misconduct. See NRS 612.385.”
Leeson v. Basic Refractories, 705 P.2d 137 (Nev. 1985).
“Pursuant to NRS 612.515(3), the Board of Review is authorized to “affirm, modify or reverse” a decision of the appeals referee.”
Lellis v. Archie, 516 P.2d 469 (Nev. 1973).
“) The record does not indicate that the board of review directed that any new evidence be taken.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 612.515(1) — 2 cases
McCracken v. Fancy, 639 P.2d 552 (Nev. 1982).
“See NRS 612.515(1). Fancy sought judicial review of the administrative decision against her.”
Jones v. Rosner, 719 P.2d 805 (Nev. 1986).
“The executive director of the Nevada Employment Security Department denied respondent benefits on the basis that she was terminated for misconduct. See NRS 612.385.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 612.515(3) — 3 cases
Kraft v. Nevada Emp. Sec. Dep't, 717 P.2d 583 (Nev. 1986).
“In so holding, we stated: Pursuant to NRS 612.515(3), the Board of Review is authorized to “affirm, modify or reverse” a decision of the appeals referee.”
Leeson v. Basic Refractories, 705 P.2d 137 (Nev. 1985).
“Pursuant to NRS 612.515(3), the Board of Review is authorized to “affirm, modify or reverse” a decision of the appeals referee.”
Lellis v. Archie, 516 P.2d 469 (Nev. 1973).
“) The record does not indicate that the board of review directed that any new evidence be taken.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.