Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 613.250 (2026)
Agreements prohibiting employment because of nonmembership in labor organization prohibited
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 613.250 Agreements prohibiting employment because of nonmembership in
labor organization prohibited. No
person shall be denied the opportunity to obtain or retain employment because
of nonmembership in a labor organization, nor shall the State, or any subdivision
thereof or any corporation, individual or association of any kind enter into
any agreement, written or oral, which excludes any person from employment or
continuation of employment because of nonmembership in a labor organization.
[2:1:1953]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1962–2024 · leading case: Branch v. City of Myrtle Beach, 505 S.E.2d 925 (S.C. Ct. App. 1998).
Branch v. City of Myrtle Beach, 505 S.E.2d 925 (S.C. Ct. App. 1998). “15, § 12; Nev.Rev.Stat. § 613.250; Utah Code Ann. § 34-34-2 ; Va.”
Cone v. Nevada Serv. Employees Union/SEIU Local 1107, 998 P.2d 1178 (Nev. 2000). “027 that would prohibit the union from charging nonmembers fees for individual representation.”
Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. S. Nevada Water Auth., 979 P.2d 224 (Nev. 1999). “Right to Work Statute Nevada’s right to work statute, NRS 613.250, states: No person shall be denied the opportunity to obtain or retain employment because of nonmembership in a labor organization, or shall the state, or any subdivision thereof or any corporation, individual or…”
Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Elec. Ry. & Motor Coach Employees v. Las Vegas-Tonopah-Reno Stage Line, Inc., 202 F. Supp. 726 (D. Nev. 1962). “NRS 613.250 contains this important language: “No person shall be denied the opportunity to obtain or retain employment because of nonmembership in a labor organization, nor shall the state, or any subdivision thereof or any corporation, individual or association of any kind…”
Indep. Guard Ass'n, Local No. 1 v. Wackenhut Servs., Inc., 522 P.2d 1010 (Nev. 1974). “NRS 613.250 provides: “No person shall be denied the opportunity to obtain or retain employment because of non-membership in a labor organization, or shall the state, or any subdivision thereof or any corporation, individual or association of any kind enter into any agreement,…”
Local Jt. Exec. Bd. v. NLRB, 883 F.3d 1129 (9th Cir. 2018). “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 613.250 ; see also 29 U.”
Valley Hosp. Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 93 F.4th 1120 (9th Cir. 2024). “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 613.250 . The Agreement expired, and Valley Hospital initially continued dues checkoff.”
Bair v. Berry, 464 P.2d 469 (Nev. 1970). “what he claimed was his inability to either get a job through the union hiring hall or to hold a job once he eventually was given one, he brought action alleging that the local union, together with its officers and agents, and the International, of which the local was a member,…”
Patrick Morrisey, Attorney Gen. v. WV AFL-CIO (W. Va. 2020). “2 (West 2013; enacted 1977) (declaring it unlawful to refuse or deny employment based on a refusal to join or affiliate with a labor organization); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 613.250 (2017; enacted 1953) (barring denial of employment or continuation of employment based upon nonmembership…”
Patrick Morrisey, Attorney Gen. v. WV AFL-CIO (W. Va. 2020). “2 (West 2013; enacted 1977) (declaring it unlawful to refuse or deny employment based on a refusal to join or affiliate with a labor organization); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 613.250 (2017; enacted 1953) (barring denial of employment or continuation of employment based upon nonmembership…”
Valley Hosp. Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. (9th Cir. 2024). “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 613.250 . The Agreement expired, and Valley Hospital initially continued dues checkoff.”
Valley Hosp. Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. (9th Cir. 2024). “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 613.250 . The Agreement expired, and Valley Hospital initially continued dues checkoff.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.