Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616D.030 (2026)

Limitation of liability of insurer or third-party administrator; administrative fines are exclusive remedies

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NRS 616D.030 Limitation of liability of insurer or third-party administrator; administrative fines are exclusive remedies.

1. No cause of action may be brought or maintained against an insurer or a third-party administrator who violates any provision of this chapter or chapter 616A, 616B, 616C or 617 of NRS.

2. The administrative fines provided for in NRS 616B.318 and 616D.120 are the exclusive remedies for any violation of this chapter or chapter 616A, 616B, 616C or 617 of NRS committed by an insurer or a third-party administrator.

(Added to NRS by 1995, 2122)

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1996–2009 · leading case: Madera v. State Indus. Ins. Sys., 956 P.2d 117 (Nev. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Madera v. State Indus. Ins. Sys., 956 P.2d 117 (Nev. 1998). · cites it 42× “All of the matters were initiated prior to the effective date of NRS 616D.030, which prohibits the commencement or maintenance of such actions.”

Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc. v. Beckwith, 989 P.2d 882 (Nev. 1999). · cites it 6× “Dillard claims a private cause of action for tortious discharge for filing a workers' compensation claim no longer exists in Nevada after the legislature, in 1995, passed NRS 616D.030: 1. No cause of action may be brought or maintained against an insurer or a third-party…”

KRAVE Ent., LLC v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 667 F. Supp. 2d 1232 (D. Nev. 2009). · cites it 12× “Defendant argues that pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes § 616D.030, Plaintiff is barred from bringing this action.”

Torre v. JC Penney Co., Inc., 916 F. Supp. 1029 (D. Nev. 1996). · cites it 6× “§ 616D.030, which took effect on July 1, 1995.”

DeOliveira v. Liberty Mut. Ins., 870 A.2d 1066 (Conn. 2005). “2004) (conferring exclusive jurisdiction on commission to determine if employer or insurer “has acted with a lack of diligence, in bad faith, or has committed an independent tort in adjusting or settling the claim for compensation”); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616D.030 (2003) 12…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.