Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 618 - OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 618.015 (2026)

Purpose of chapter

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 618.015  Purpose of chapter.

      1.  It is the purpose of this chapter to provide safe and healthful working conditions for every employee by:

      (a) Establishing regulations;

      (b) Effectively enforcing such regulations;

      (c) Educating and training employees; and

      (d) Establishing reporting procedures for job-related accidents, motor vehicle crashes and illnesses.

      2.  The Legislature finds that such safety and health in employment is a matter greatly affecting the public interest of this State.

      (Added to NRS by 1973, 1010; A 2015, 1689)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1991–1992 · leading case: D'Angelo v. Gardner, 819 P.2d 206 (Nev. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
D'Angelo v. Gardner, 819 P.2d 206 (Nev. 1991). · cites it 4× “" NRS 618.015(2). After reviewing provisions in the California Labor Code which are comparable to NOSHA, the California Court of Appeal had this to say about public policy and the termination of employees because of their seeking a safe work place: It requires little analysis to…”
Sanders v. Culinary Workers Union Local No. 226, 783 F. Supp. 531 (D. Nev. 1992). · cites it 2× “(Citing Nev.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 618.015 (Michie 1986)).”
Sanders v. Culinary Workers Union Local No. 226, 804 F. Supp. 86 (D. Nev. 1992). · cites it 2× “(Citing Nev.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 618.015 (Michie 1986)).”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 618.015(2): 1 case
D'Angelo v. Gardner, 819 P.2d 206 (Nev. 1991). “" NRS 618.015(2). After reviewing provisions in the California Labor Code which are comparable to NOSHA, the California Court of Appeal had this to say about public policy and the termination of employees because of their seeking a safe work place: It requires little analysis to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.