Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 630.369 (2026)

Injecting patient with certain chemotherapeutic agents

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 630.369  Injecting patient with certain chemotherapeutic agents.

      1.  A person, other than a physician, shall not inject a patient with any chemotherapeutic agent classified as a prescription drug unless:

      (a) The person is licensed or certified to perform medical services pursuant to this title;

      (b) The administration of the injection is within the scope of the person’s license or certificate; and

      (c) The person administers the injection under the supervision of a physician. The Board shall prescribe the requirements for supervision pursuant to this subsection.

      2.  As used in this section:

      (a) “Dangerous drug” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 454.201.

      (b) “Prescription drug” means:

             (1) A controlled substance or dangerous drug that may be dispensed to an ultimate user only pursuant to a lawful prescription; and

             (2) Any other substance or drug substituted for such a controlled substance or dangerous drug.

      (Added to NRS by 2007, 3041)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: Fierle v. Perez, 219 P.3d 906 (Nev. 2009).
Fierle v. Perez, 219 P.3d 906 (Nev. 2009). · cites it 6× “Since the injection of the prescription-only chemotherapeutic agent necessarily occurred under the physician's supervision, NRS 630.369, remand as to the nurse requires remand as to both the physician and the nurse under traditional res ipsa doctrine.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 630.369(1): 1 case
Fierle v. Perez, 219 P.3d 906 (Nev. 2009). “Since the injection of the prescription-only chemotherapeutic agent necessarily occurred under the physician's supervision, NRS 630.369, remand as to the nurse requires remand as to both the physician and the nurse under traditional res ipsa doctrine.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 630.369(1)(c): 1 case
Fierle v. Perez, 219 P.3d 906 (Nev. 2009). “Since the injection of the prescription-only chemotherapeutic agent necessarily occurred under the physician's supervision, NRS 630.369, remand as to the nurse requires remand as to both the physician and the nurse under traditional res ipsa doctrine.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 630.369(l)(c): 1 case
Fierle v. Perez, 219 P.3d 906 (Nev. 2009). “Since the injection of the prescription-only chemotherapeutic agent necessarily occurred under the physician's supervision, NRS 630.369, remand as to the nurse requires remand as to both the physician and the nurse under traditional res ipsa doctrine.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.